Final Rejoinder to Mirza Tahir
Mirza Tahir Qadiani played a trick on his Jama'at recently. He produced
for them a stunt which he named 'Mubahala'. By injecting morphine
into his Jama'at in this manner, he sought to deaden their sensibility
and therefore headed his Mubahala pamphlet as follows:
"Open challenge of Mubahala from Jama'at Ahmadiya Alamgir
to the enemies, the Kaffir-makers and the beliers the world over".
Whereas, Mirza Tahir sent the copies of his published challenge contained
in his pamphlet of 'Mubahala' to the elders of Ummat-e-Islamia
and the elite of Millat-e-Muhmmadiya, he included, among the
recipients, the name of this dervish, unknown and humble, for reasons
best known to him. This humble being having received it, prepared its rejoinder,
Reply to Mirza Tahir's Challenge of Mubahala, and addressed
it to Mirza Tahir during Muharram ul Haram, 1409, A.H. Several magazines
and journals of Pakistan and India published it under the caption: "In
reply to Mirza Tahir". Also, it was brought out in the form of a separate
booklet. Its copies and Photostats in thousands were distributed in Canada,
America and other countries. Not only that, its various translated versions
in the English language were also printed and vastly distributed in foreign
lands. By the grace of Allah, the Qadiani progeny of liars could not and
cannot wriggle out from the impact of arguments contained therein till Doomsday.
Since my rejoinder had bound down Mirza Tahir for a response and knowing
it would be no easy matter, I allowed him a comfortably long period of four
months, i.e. till January 1, 1989. Despite my let-up, he failed to meet the
date because he stood in a quagmire. Confused, non-pulsed and check-mated
he had no ground to move backward or forward and no room to wheel about.
Ultimately, he managed with his Secretary to draft some sort of a random
reply a copy of which is reproduced below followed by my comments captioned:
"Final Rejoinder to Mirza Tahir, Last Nail in Qadiani Coffin".
Respected readers would not fail to discern that Mirza Tahir really fell
through great blunders by coming out with his 'Mubahala' challenge,
Firstly: The decomposed and putrefied Qadiani corpse had to be exhumed
for a post-mortem. This challenge subjected it to its detailed diagnostic
Secondly: When at Mirza Tahir's invitation, I called upon him to come
out in the open ground of Mubahala and pick up the gauntlet in a
rendezvous, he curled down his tail meekly-- a welcome token of submission
--and fled for safety. As Qadiani norms go, scores of interpretations flowed
Thirdly: Although this humble self had allowed a four month period
for giving me a reply, Allah the Exalted inflicted a death like stupor over
Mirza Tahir and his progeny who lay benumbed till the term expired. At last,
the Qadiani Secretary managed to muster himself up to write out some sort
of reply. Actually, this was a work of hardly five minutes for the Qadiani
secretary, but Allah, the Exalted wanted to expose Qadiani infamy and effrontery
and therefore a five minute work took more then four months.
Fourthly: Mirza Tahir and his whole Jama'at fell short of
words because Allah made me recount such startling facts from Qadiani history
in respect of Mirza Tahir's father and grand-father as thoroughly exposed
Mirza Qadiani to be a compulsive liar, dualist-infidel and accursed apostate.
Fifthly: Mirza Tahir failed in his effort to distort Quranic sense
of the term 'Mubahala'. His twisting earned him nothing but a run-out
from Mubahala rendezvous, befitting his grandpa's own unwitting utterance,
viz. 'Died under divine execration'.
In my humble opinion, Mirza Tahir will not dare take up this renewed call-out
of mine. Rather, he would not have the grace to respond even.
Now, I produce a copy of the Qadiani letter, followed by our comments on
Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi
English translation of the Qadiani Letter
Janab Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Sahib Ludhianvi,
The pamphlet, published on your behalf, in reply to the 'Mubahala'
invitation of Imam-e-Jama'at-e- Ahmadiya, Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad,
has been received in which you have left no stone unturned in twisting truths
and have tried once again to show your internal condition to the world by
repeating absolutely loose and filthy blames. The way in which you have tried
to put foul charges over holy personages of Allah, the Exalted, what reply
can there be except in the words of Quran-e-Kareem which says: 'Allah's
curse on the liars'.
It's surprising that on the one hand you are showing attachment to the holy
raiment of Muhammad(SAW) and on
the other your disposition is so abhorrent as is not even distantly related
You say "falsity of Mirza has become as apparent as the sun at its meridian",
but, queer enough, Allah, the Exalted, is continuing to give day by day
advancement to the high order Ahmadiya whose foundation Mirza Sahib laid
in 1889 and auspicious souls in large numbers are entering this holy order,
but blind like you are still groping in darkness.
In your pamphlet, you have repeated all over again all those blames which
you have been alleging for almost a century, for which reason, the
Imam-e-Jama'at-e-Ahmadiya, had to give the challenge of
'Mubahala', at last. If there was one bit of nobility in you, you
should have accepted the challenge of Mubahala of Imam Jama'at Ahmadiya
in a straight-forward manner, so that the world would have known that you
are truthful and you would not have thought of undertaking the path of flight.
'Mubahala' is not the name of argumentation or disputation but
it means taking the matter to the divine court through invocations going
beyond debates and discussions. 'Mubahala' is the name of asking for
decision through invocation from Allah, the Exalted, but gathering together
of parties (to dispute) at some specified place is not necessary by the
(interpretation of) the verse of Mubahala. Therefore your asking to
come out on such and such date at such and such time, at Minar-e-Pakistan
or any other place means nothing but your fleeing away from
'Mubahala'. Our belief is that Allah is present everywhere in the
universe and from His Grasp of Authority no place is outside and no spot
without His sway and might. His seat circumscribes the earth and the sky.
Why do you hesitate to address Allah and pronounce His curse on the liars
and why do you consider that presence of the concerned parties is necessary?
Therefore if you possess moral or conscientious courage then come out like
a man of action and after writing out all those blames which have been narrated
in the 'Mubahala' pamphlet published on June 10, 1988 and which you
think are correct, you write 'Allah's curse on the liars', and put your
signature. Then see, how does Allah the Exalted distinguish between a truthful
and a lying party within the fixed duration.
But we give you advice to undertake righteousness and seek forgiveness of
Allah and leave temerity against Allah's appointed Imam so that you save
yourself from Allah's wrath and take warning from the corroborative tokens
which Allah the Exalted has so far revealed.
Rasheed Ahmad Chowdhry
Press Secretary Jama'at Ahmadiya
Final Rejoinder to Mirza Tahir
Last Nail in Qadiani Coffin
(Note: Qadianis call themselves 'Ahmadis')
Janab Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib,
Peace be on those who follow the right path!
You may recall that some time back you arranged for sending a copy of your
'Mubahala' challenge in the name of this humble self also. In reply,
I accepted your challenge. My letter dated 18th Muharram ul Haram,
1409 A.H. refers.
I told you in this letter: Start in the name of Allah; come out by appointing
some date, time and place where you shall find this dervish waiting
for you. In this very letter, I proposed to you, on my own, a certain place,
date and time for holding this rendezvous. I did so lest you should back
out. I gave you four months time for sending me a reply till the first of
January 1989. Your reply reached me on 3rd January 1989, but it bore the
signature of your Secretary Sahib. Anyhow, thanks for the acknowledgment
and permit me to comment on certain points which have been raised in your
Point No. 1
Your Secretary Sahib writes:
'The pamphlet published on your behalf, in reply to the 'Mubahala
invitation of Imam-e-Jama'ate-Ahmadiya, Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad,
has been received in which you have left nothing undone in distorting truths
and have tried to exhibit; once again, your inward nature to the world, by
repeating absolutely loose and filthy blames. In this way you have endeavored
to place foul allegations on holy personages of Allah, the Exalted. What
reply can there be to them, except in the words of Quran-e-Kareem:
"Allah's curse on the liars".
Comments on Point No. 1
Let me, first of all, do you justice for your truthfulness. You call my
communication a 'published pamphlet'; no, it was a letter, written on my
letterhead with my name on it. It was sent to you by registered post and
it carried my signature and seal. To call my letter a published pamphlet
reminds me of the famous proverb: "A thief might leave stealing, but not
prying-about. Imagine, when tricksters are apt to dodge unwary people by
calling letters as published pamphlets, what distortions would they not have
perpetrated on the Quranic text and Ahadith?
You say, I have tried to bare out my latent morbidity before outside people,
by having repeated my earlier-leveled charges but there is my letter before
all. Anybody reading it will conclude that my presentations were historical
truths, taken from the Qadiani history. Do you call them allegations and
blames from my side? No, I presented ten facts--all from the Qadiani history,
five of them related to your grand-father, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani and
five to your father Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani. Those historical facts mirrored
your face and reflected on Qadianism. No surprise, when this mirror was held
up to you, for looking in, you took it ill.
Now, I enumerate those ten facts and challenge you to pin-point the one which
is not recorded in your Qadiani history.
Details of 5 Facts in Respect of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani
Fact No. 1
In his book, Anjam-e-Atham, P. 282, Mirza Qadiani declared: "We would
not, in future, call Ulema for a 'Mubahala'." I ask you: why in view
of this categorical declaration, did you break the pledge made by your Sire-Mirza
and how could you address the Ulema? It is obvious you have no reply to this
tweezers of a question of mine. I told you earlier and say again that, Insha
Allah, you'll never be able to answer me till the day of your Doom. You
are left now with no recourse and I see you wearing a countenance of run-out
shame. You are sputtering at me when you say I am repeating allegations.
Fact No. 2
In order to relate this fact, I invite your attention to a writing of your
sire, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, from his book Appendix to Anjam-e-Atham,
"Remember, if the second part of this prediction does not come about, I should
be deemed worse than every wicked".
What was the second part of the prediction to which Mirza Qadiani referred?
I shall tell one who may not be knowing it. It was a prediction, made by
Mirza for his second marriage with an already married lady, called Muhammadi
Begum; that is, when her husband would die, Muhammadi Begum, the widow, would
marry Mirza Qadiani.
This was the second part of his prediction to which he referred in his above
writing (in Appendix to Anjam-e-Atham)
But luck did not smile over Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the dejected Romeo.
The elusive bride could not be got hold of, because her husband, the
rival-in-love, Sultan Muhammad, did not die. Instead the angel of death came
to help Mirza Ghulam Ahmad pack up, to carry him to the higher story! Therefore,
this cavalier don met no success with the donna.
I ask you, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani's second part
of prediction come true? Did Muhammadi Begum become widow in Mirza
Qadiani's lifetime? No, then call him in his outlandish lingo: "Worse than
every wicked". Any doubt in it? Mirza Tahir! Am I untruthful?
I am amazed, Mirza Tahir, at your rude impudence. You are coming to a
Mubahala rendezvous in support of a 'worse' man. Tell me, have I concocted
this comparative-degree- adjectival-epithet against your so-called 'holy
personage'. Have I coined it ("worse than every wicked") or your
grand-papa has himself done so? This is my second question which your entire
Jama'at Qadiani, misnamed by you as Jama'at Ahmadiya, feels
frustrated to reply.
Fact No. 3
This is an interesting episode, again from the Qadiani history:
Once, Mirza Qadiani arranged to convene a discussion with a local head of
Episcopal diocese, named Atham. For fifteen days, argumentation continued.
When Mirza could not beat his adversary, he invoked Allah for a decision.
He pronounced that Allah had made this decision for Atham and that this liar
would be thrown into 'Ha via', (Hell) within fifteen months from June
Mirza predicted in these words in his book 'Junge-Muqaddas', P. 293:
"I admit right now that if this prediction goes false, i.e. if within fifteen
months from this day, the party deemed to be liar in Allah's view does not
fall into 'Ha via' as death punishment, then I am prepared to undergo
every type of punishment: disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around
my neck or hang me on the gallows. I am prepared for everything".
Time-limit started shrinking and Qadiani Jama'at was certain that
Atham would die within fifteen months because Sire Mirza Qadiani had written:
"And I swear by the greatness of Allah that He will certainly do so, will
certainly do so; will certainly do so; the earth and sky may deviate but
not His ordainments".
As the zero hour drew nearer and the countdown started, Mirza Qadiani madly
"If I am a liar, keep the gallows ready for me and consider me the most accursed
of all the accursed persons, the evil-doers and the satans". (Jung-e-Muqaddas,
During the night preceding the avowed daybreak, the town of Qadian went into
a drone of tumult and tribulation. Men, women, big and small rubbed their
noses on the earth, lamenting:
"O Allah, Atham may die; O Allah Atham be dead!
O Allah, send a bolt from the blue for Atham!"
They were certain Atham would not live to see the dawn of the next day. Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, on his part, worked out spells of sorcery the whole
night before Atham's death and had charms recited over black grams to be
thrown into blind dry wells. (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, Vol. 1, P. 178; Vol. 2, P.
Despite all invocations, contrivances and hullabaloo, Atham saw the dawn
and many more dawns for many years. Thus, Allah the Exalted, testified
Mirza's prediction was not a divine revelation;
Mirza's prediction was his imposture;
Mirza deserved the punishment he had proposed on himself, that is:
"Blacken my face";
"Collar a rope around my neck";
"Hang me on the gallows".
Mirza Tahir Sahib, I ask you, In view of your Sire's calling himself "the
most accursed of all accursed persons, the evil doers and the satans,"
have I used these superlative-degree adjectival- epithets about him or it
was your sire grand-papa himself who used them about hisself? Are you wanting
a 'Mubahala' rendezvous in support of a satan who is most accursed
of all satans? Tell me, is there one single word wrong in this factual event
from the Qadiani history?
Fact No. 4
The fourth fact from your Qadiani history is a Mubahala challenge
between Mirza Qadiani and Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi (May Allah rest his
soul in peace). This was held on Zeeqada 10, 1310 A.H. in Eidgah of Amritsar.
The late Maulana's challenge was on this issue: Mirza and his Mirzais were
a coterie of liars, unbelievers, heretics, impostors and Dualist-infidels.
(Majmua-e- Ishtiharat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, Vol. 1, P. 425). And Mirza
Qadiani had already declared that:
"Whosoever is the liar out of the Mubahala participants, perishes
during the lifetime of the truthful ' (Malfuzat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani
,Vol. 9, P. 440).
In accordance with the above stipulation, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was
the liar as he perished during the lifetime of Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi
on May 26, 1908, whereas the Maulana Sahib (Allah's mercy on him), lived
for 9 years after Mirza's death. (Raees-e-Qadian, Vol. 2 P. 192 and
Tarikh-e-Mirza, P. 38).
Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, in your letter you have defined Mubahala
in these words: "To take a matter to the court of Allah, the Exalted, through
invocation is named Mubahala. To supplicate Allah, the Exalted, for
a decision is called Mubahala." From this definition, it is obvious
that Divine Court is the supreme-most court whose decision is definite, direct
and unambiguous. There can never be an iota of a mistake in it, God forbid.
When, as a result of the aforesaid Mubahala, the Divine Court has
already decided that Mirza Qadiani was an arch-liar, Dualist-infidel, one-eyed
impostor, renegade and a Kafir, do you wish now to appeal against this decision?
Remember, to reject this court's jurisdiction is kufr, to deviate from
its decision is kufr, to appeal for its revision is kufr. Tell me, if
there is one single word which I have uttered here is untrue. Actually, the
questions I have raised cannot be answered by the whole Mirzai progeny put
Mirza Tahir Ahmad, if you believe in Allah and if you are not an atheist,
then come out to accept Allah's Decision wholeheartedly and proclaim to the
World that your grand-father was a grand-liar. If you will not do that, then
people will have no choice but to consider you a reproduction of what your
grand-father once said in his Majmua-e- Ishtiharat, Vol. 1, P. 397:
"The Jewish people by becoming targets of execration turned into baboons
and swine. In their respect, it is recorded in some commentaries on the holy
Quran that apparently they were humans but their inward condition had become
like that of baboons and swine and receptivity for accepting truth was wholly
wrested from them. This is the sign of metamorphosed inferior shapes that
they cannot accept truth, even when manifestly revealed to them. "
In Zameema-e-Anjam-e-Atham, P. 21, your grandfather wrote:
"The most unclean among all the animals of the world and highly loathsome
is swine but more polluted than swine are those men who hide evidence of
truth and honesty due to their selfish motivation"
Incidentally, here the grandpa has exposed his grandson unwittingly!
Fact No. 5
I refer to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani's published notification, titled:
"The Final Decision with Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib Amritsari":
In this, Mirza implored Allah, humbly and earnestly:
"O Allah! if I am truthful, destroy Maulvi Sanaullah in my lifetime, by strokes
of celestial punishments like plague and cholera and if Maulvi Sanaullah
Sahib is truthful and I am a liar, a knave, a mischief-monger in Your eyes,
then destroy me in the lifetime of Maulana Sanaullah."
Allah, the Exalted, issued His Decision. In line with Mirza's own malediction,
Allah destroyed him on May 26, 1908, through the pestilence of cholera.
(Hayat-e-Nasir, P.15). But Maulana Sanaullah Sahib (Allah's mercy on him),
lived on and on for an amazingly long period of forty-one years after Mirza's
doom. This Divine Decision proves again that Mirza was a liar, a knave,
a trickster, and a mischief-monger, to quote his own words.
I ask you, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, have you asked me for a Mubahala rendezvous
in support of this impostor? Tell me, which word in this writing of mine
will you call an accusation?
Here, I turn your attention to a notable point: The Quran-e-Hakeem
has quoted an imprecation which was uttered by Kuffar-e-Makkah. They
"O Allah! if this (Deen) is indeed the truth from Thee, then rain down
on us a shower of stones from the sky or send on us painful torments"
(Quran, Al-Anfal 8:32)
Look at the extreme misfortune, stupidity and perverseness of the idolaters
of Makkah that they did not invoke Allah for granting to them His
favor. They did not say, "O Allah! grant us the ability to accept the
Deen, brought by the Holy Prophet
Muhammad(SAW), in case it is really
from Thee". Instead, the Kafirs of Makkah said if Deen-e-Islam
was genuine then stones should rain down on them or they be annihilated
by Divine Punishment!
Tafseer-e-Usmani (Maktaba Rashidia, P-234) says:
"Abu Jahl is reported to have invoked Allah in these words in front of Ka'ba
when leaving Makkah (for the Battle of Badr). As a result,
he witnessed a sample of what he had asked for ".
Following the example of Kuffar-e-Makkah, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani
did not say: "O Allah! if I am astray in Your eyes, set me on right path
and forgive me". Instead he prayed: "O Allah! if I am a liar, knave or
a mischief-monger then destroy me during Maulana Sanaullah's life". Compare
this self-curse of Mirza Qadiani to that of Abu Jahl. Where is the difference
in the purport? Abu Jahl said: "If
Muhammad(SAW) is truthful and we
are liars, destroy us through bolts and stones from the sky". Mirza said:
"If Maulana Sanaullah is truthful and I am a liar, destroy me in front of
him". Abu Jahl got his asked-for in Badr and Mirza got his asked-for
on May 26, 1908, both getting their asked-for ultimately. Does this carry
any lesson for you, Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, the Imam of self-styled Jama'at
Details of Five Facts Recorded in Qadiani History
in Respect of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani
Mirza Tahir Ahmad, I have enumerated five facts recorded in Qadiani history
about your 'grandpa', Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, and now enumerate a similar number
selected from your Qadiani history concerning your 'daddy' Mirza Mahmud Ahmad.
My purpose in doing so is to stress that the 'Dad', despite Mubahala
challenges made to him for half a century, did not come forward to reply
not even once - nor did any of his progeny. Therefore, clearing this out-standing
debt of five decades is your first charge, Mirza Tahir Ahmad! You should
settle that encumbrance first. I tell you a way out, if you are in search
of one: start with a denial of these facts and swear on Oath that Allah's
wrath fall on you if you are telling a lie. Having done that you should take
on the Mubahala rendezvous with Ulema of Ummat.
I am again reminded of a proverb, which runs like this: Let a winnower [sifter]
sing if it wants to, but why let a sieve which has seventy two holes; that
is, if somebody else wants to run the gauntlet, he may, but not you, Mirza
Tahir, who are loaded with fifty to sixty outstanding Mubahalas. Sure,
you are sitting snug in mother's lap cuddling in the British manger; what
has pricked you to have come out mooing!
'Don't eulogize your stained cloak too much; just look at its flap, just
glance at the tunic's knot'.
Fact No. 1
Maulana Abdul Kareem accused your father, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, of immorality
in 1927. He asked him to face him in a Mubahala, but Mirza Mahmud
would not. As a result, the poor soul was penalized. Attempt was made on
his life, his friend's house was put to flames and he was dragged in courts.
Ultimately, he was driven out from Qadian. Till the last, Mirza Mahmud did
never have any courage to face him in Mubahala. Still worse, none
of the sons of the accused had the graciousness to project their father's
morals. None has come forward to take oath before Allah on pain of His pestilence
catching him if Abdul Kareem was true and their father immoral.
Fact No. 2
Similar immorality charge was made by Abdur Rahman Misri, in 1936. As a result,
he was also maltreated and a breach of peace case was instituted against
him in which this poor man gave the following statement in the court on oath:
"The present Khalifa (Mirza Mahmud) is extremely immoral. He hunts women
under the guise of sainthood. For this purpose, he has kept some men and
women as his agents. Through them, he gets hold of innocent girls and boys.
He has formed a society in which men and women have been taken in and adultery
is committed in this social get-together." (Mumtaz Ahmad Farooq, Fateh Haq,
Before proceeding further, let me highlight the background of this incident
for the benefit of those who may not be knowing. This timid dotard Abdur
Rahman Misri used to be a slave-like disciple of Mirza Mahmud Ahmad. As a
'Mureed', he was so foolishly obedient to his 'Peer' that he cringed
about with folded arms and low gaze in front of him. Once, the 'Peer', i.e.
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, feeling lusty over his 'mureed' Misri's son, satisfied
his lust by making the boy his target on his practicing board. Misri was
shocked. He gaped and marrow in his bones numbed. Collecting his fallen-out
crest, he asked Mirza Mahmud to appoint a high-powered committee of Qadiani
elite and said he would appear in person before the elders, to prove that
this sordid and unnatural act was actually perpetrated by the Khalifa over
his minor son. Instead of accepting this demand, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani
sprang up to make Misri and his friend Fakhrud Din Multani a butt of his
reprisal. As a result, Misri was dragged into courts while Multani was found
You, Mirza Tahir, have never come forward, vouching for your daddy's morals.
Why not, I ask? Why have you not sworn before Allah, on pain of His wrath
falling on you, if this is true. Well, you can do it now. Your father Mirza
Mahmud tried to side-track Misri's complaint by calling the affair an act
of enmity of the hypocrites. By hypocrites, I know, he meant the Lahori party
Here I digress, for an interesting episode which is recorded in Qadiani history.
Once, in a Jum'a speech, Mirza Mahmud read out a letter he had received
from a person whom he later called a hypocrite. This letter said:
"Hazrat Sire, the promised messiah (i.e., Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani) was
a friend of Allah and friends of Allah commit adultery now and then only.
Therefore, if the grand-sire committed adultery occasionally, so what?...
We have no objection on Hazrat grand-sire, the promised Messiah (i.e., Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani), because he committed adultery at times only; but our
objection is on the present Khalifa (i.e., Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Qadiani) because
he commits adultery all the time!"
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad was pleased to read out this 'holiest of holy' document,
brazen-faced, from a pulpit in his Jum'a speech. After reading it,
he did not contradict its contents. He did not swear before Allah that Divine
wrath might fall on him, if he was an adulterer. He only passed a harmless
sort of remark which is recorded in black and white and published by Qadiani
newspaper Al-Fazl, dated 31st August 1938. Mirza Mahmud said:
"It appears from this objection that this person is Paighami Tab'a" (i.e.
of Lahori party of Mirzais).
My digression ends here. In view of this gross charge, the readily seen
conclusion is that limb by limb, joint by joint, and pore by pore, Mirza
Mahmud was a doer of asocial, immoral and unnatural acts. Can anybody doubt
the stinking fermentation of his base elements?
Fact No. 3
In 1956, some young men from amongst Qadianis formed a party by the name
of Haqiqat Pasand Party with the object of exposing Mirza Mahmud Ahmad's
evil conjuration which he performed in Samri style. They published a book
called Tarikh-e-Mahmudiat. In this, they collected eye-witness accounts
of twenty-eight Qadiani men and women who left Qadianism because of Mirza
Mahmud's immorality. All the narration in the book are given on oath before
Allah that they are not lies. Evidences therein prove that Mirza Mahmud was
a very immoral person. Although Mirza Mahmud was alive those days, when the
book was published, he dared not disprove any of those acts of his, to the
extent that when they were repeated in subsequent writings none of his progeny
challenged them. How about you, Mirza Tahir, to pick up the gauntlet now?
But I know you wouldn't do so. This betrays that your criminal conscience
abets it. Having been challenged for so many Mubahalas, as if they
were oozing of mother's milk for your suckling, you have now come forward,
on your own, asking for a Mubahala.
These facts which I have given are from Qadiani household after 1937, but
previous to this there have been reports of dissolute acts of the Don Juan
(i.e. Mirza Mahmud Ahmad) in his student life and of his adolescent waywardness.
Is it not from your history that your grandfather (the counterfeit Messiah,
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani), once set up an inquiry against your father (Mirza
Mahmud Ahmad) for his juvenile delinquency but your father escaped punishment
for lack of four eye-witnesses to his actual acts?
Mumtaz Ahmad Farooq, in 'Fateh Haq', has also described the above
episode: How Mirza Mahmud Ahmad had sunk into sexy involvement from the very
start of his puberty. His father (i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani)
once instituted an inquiry against him on receiving reports of his committing
immoral acts. There were four persons appointed to this commission of inquiry:
Maulvi Noorud Din, Khawja Kamal ud Din, Maulvi Muhammad Ali and Maulvi Sher
Ali. When the commission met to inquire, the mother of the accused presented
herself secretly before them and held out front flap of her shirt supplicating
before the commissioners. Admitting his guilt, she begged for mercy on behalf
of her son. She pleaded to them that his sinful son, if caught, would be
turned out of the house by his father. As a result of this intercession by
your grandmother, these "four sententious pundits" acquitted the accused
under cover of Qadiani Fiqah.
As luck would have it, Allah punished these four exponents of Qadiani Shariat
at the very hands of this very 'accused' when he took over the reins of
Khalifaship later. Mirza Muhammad Hussain in his book,
Fitnn-e-Inkar-e-Khatm-e-Nubuwwat, has apprised us of this event.
Fact No. 4
The fourth fact, recorded in your Qadiani history, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, is
about the manner in which both your father and grandfather tumbled out of
this world. Here I put a question to you: Would you not say that their deaths
were in the nature of a Divine Warning given to mankind? If you say they
were not, OK, then would you pray to Allah to afford you the same type of
ouster from the world? This question I had put to you earlier also, but you
did not reply, because where are your guts for it?! I appreciate your reasons.
You are scared of that death-bed agony: into hell before hell. But
would you not allow the people of the world an opportunity to see the spectacle
of Allah teaching you a lesson? You could still provide the world some fun,
if you Published an answer to my question.
Fact No. 5
I have drawn your attention to a number of challenge made by my renowned
friend, Maulana Manzoor Ahmad Chinioti, first to your father as long he was
alive and then to your brother Mirza Nasir and after his death to you lastly.
I should say he has been holding annual anniversaries of these challenges.
To ensure, he sends these challenges to Qadiani leaders by registered post
and in every meeting which he addresses, he speaks from public platform in
'Swear by Allah that you or your daddy were never an active subject or a
passive object of an immoral act'?
Your father and your brother did not have the courage to answer. Now, your
good self too lack sufficient pluck.
Blind the evil eye! Have you invited Ulema for a Mubahala on behalf
of such sanctimonious persons! Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, these are not blames.
These are facts which you and your family cannot deny till your Doomsday.
These are bright like the sun but you Secretary Sahib, blind like bat, writes
'You have tried to put foul charges over holy personages'
Libertines, holy personages? O Allah protect us! Was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad holy?
Was Mirza Mahmud Ahmad holy?
I refer to a 'Fatwa', given by your Mufti of Qadian to a person named
Muhammad Hussain Qadiani. He had asked:
"Why does holy Sire (i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani) has his arms and legs
pressed by unrelated women? The (Mufti) Chief jurist of Qadianism replied:
'He is an innocent prophet. Touching and caressing with him is not prohibited;
it's rather a source of blessing and auspiciousness (Ret. Newspaper Al-Hakm,
Vol. 1l, No. 13, P. 13, dt. 17th April, 1907)'."
Compare this with Mirza's own denial of innocence on page 5 of his book,
"Sorry that Batalvi Sahib did not understand that myself or any human can
ever claim to be innocent after the prophets, Allah's benediction on them
But your Secretary Sahib's remarks uphold even Mirza Mahmud as innocent and
holy! All greatness to Allah!
It will not be out of place, if I refer to a book titled, Hamarey Ismaili
mazhab ki haqiqat aur us ka nizam, by Doctor Zahid Ali in which Doctor
Sahib, on page 363 quotes a standing order from an Ismaili Imam, namely,
Qazi Noman Bin Muhammad, as follows:
"If you see the Imam doing adultery with your own eyes or see him drinking
wine or committing acts of lewdness, don't let your heart or tongue consider
those acts as unapproved and don't doubt their correctness and righteousness
It appears your Secretary Sahib and the choicest Qadianis like him have been
tutored on the lines of the aforesaid Imam, to consider their Khalifa holy
despite the Khalifa's lechery, despite his adultery and unnatural acts.
When men and women have produced firm evidences of immorality against Mirza
Mahmud and when the latter's off-springs have kept mum, the facts stand verified.
But for the Secretary Sahib, Mirza Mahmud is holy! Whereas Allah decided
that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was a liar, Kafir, apostate, impostor,
disgraceful, contemptible 'worse then every wicked', and sire of the clan
of accursed satans; your Secretary Sahib considers these epithets sanctimonious!
In other words, "My 'peer' is only a wee bit cheat, otherwise he is a Perfect
I call your attention to a recent communication sent by Janab Hafiz Bashir
Ahmad Masri which is a rejoinder to your Mubahala pamphlet. He summarized
in it acts of profligacy of your household thus:
The elder son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, that is Mirza Mahmud (your father) was
a habitual adulterer, having affairs with married women and unmarried girls,
to the extent that he committed incest with the forbidden womenfolk of his
Both the brothers of Mirza Mahmud, i.e. Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Mirza Shareef
Ahmad were habitual sodomites and particularly the young were their targets.
The maternal uncle of Mirza Mahmud, by name Meer Muhammad Ishaq, was also
a habitual sodomite and innocent school-going children in particular were
In short, dignitaries of Qadiani hierarchy satisfied their sexual lust, feeling
free of any social or moral restraints.
"The whole house gleamed with luminaries!"
Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, you cannot get away by brushing these historical
facts calling them unfounded allegations. Unless you absolve yourself from
the charges preferred against your father, you cannot brazen it out through
your 'Mubahala' challenge.
Point No. 2
Your Secretary Sahib writes:
"Allah the Exalted is continuing to give day by day advancement to the high
order Ahmadiya whose foundations Mirza Sahib laid in 1889 and auspicious
souls in large numbers are entering this holy order but the blind like you
are still groping in the dark".
Mirza Tahir Ahmad it is stupid to call numerical increase of your party
a proof of Divine support. I give you six explanations of which you are
Explanation No. 1
Why look at the increase alone. Look to which side it is tilting, whether
towards virtuosity or towards evil. If it is towards the former, then it
is a happy augury; otherwise don't be happy, because it is an indication
of a let-up by Allah for a subsequent pull-up. Initially, offenders are warned.
When they don't take heed, a let-up starts, that is, Allah allows them some
latitude to develop.
Therefore Allah is pleased to say:
(Translated by Mirza Mahmud himself, in his Tafseer-e-Sagheer, in Urdu, whose
English rendering is:
"Then leave me and leave those who belie this Book (i.e. don't go punishing
them yourself). We shall pull them towards gradual annihilation from sides
they wouldn't know and I will permit them a latitude (i.e. don't pray for
their destruction). My contrivance is very strong (that will ultimately put
them to destruction).
In Sura 'Al-Nisa': 115, Allah is further pleased to say:
(Translated by Mirza Mahmud, in his Tafseer-e-Saghir, in Urdu, whose English
"And if whosoever to whom guidance has been fully unfolded goes on opposing
(this) prophet and follows a path other than the path of believers, We shall
set him after the same thing that he is doggedly pursuing and will cast him
in Hell and that is a very bad abode"
Allah has made apparent Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's imposture many times, and not
only that, the pot of Mirza Mahmud's fake piousness bang-burst not once but
several times on Qadiani and Rabwah crossroads. Simultaneously, your party
has been thrown into different types of torments and troubles. As a result,
your father had to run away secretly from Qadian and your good self, too,
following his footsteps flew from Pakistan, incognito. You ran helter-skelter
to London, straight into the lap of your foster-mother, so fast that you
drew a second breath only after arriving there. Why you don't take heed from
me that Allah has provided you some let-ups. In His Divine Prudence, He has
extended your rope for a short run. Now don't misconstrue your noose loosening.
It amounts to no progress, advancement or increase of your Order of Qadianis,
in any tangible sense. Therefore, don't measure yourself by yard-stick of
numerical increase. Distinguish between profligacy and Divine Approbation.
In this world, Allah affords equal opportunities for truth and untruth to
develop. This is the nature of His Law. Those who cannot discriminate between
inflation and progress are victims of mutilated psyche. I give you an instance
Atheism is plentiful today in the world; Satanic forces are doubling up.
Evil is going up by leaps and bounds Will any wise man call this abundance
a proof of Divine support?. Is increase of Atheism an argument for its godliness?
Hence, don't puff yourself up over flatulence of Qadiani numbers. Gaseous
expansions in the belly are not a sign of health. Remember artificial stones
cannot hide their identity from the eyes of a connoisseur. Animal-culls multiply
after rainy seasons.
Explanation No. 2
The manner in which your party has maneuvered to enlarge its numbers corroborates
its shady nature. In support of my argument, I ask you to turn to the
claim which your grandfather Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani made. He said that
he was the same promised Messiah about whom Allah's
Prophet(SAW) has foretold.
Let us now recount as to what conspicuous deeds that would-be Messiah shall
be performing when he will come into the world. For this purpose, I quote
none but the actual words of your father, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad written in his
book Haqiqat ul Nubuwwat. He says, Allah's
Prophet(SAW) used these words:
"Prophets are like brothers-in-affinity. Their Mothers are different but
Deen is one. And I have the closest connection with Isa bin Mariam
because in between him and myself there is no prophet and he is about to
come down. Therefore when you see him, recognize him that he is even-statured,
red white mixed Complexion, wearing yellow clothes. Water shall be dropping
from his head although water will not have been shed over the head. He will
break the cross, kill the swine and will forsake 'jizia' and will
invite people to Islam. In his times, all religions will be dead and only
Islam will exist. Lions and camels, leopards and cows, wolves and goats will
graze about together. Children will play with snakes and they will not harm
them. Isa bin Mariam will remain on earth for forty years and then he will
die and Musalmans will offer his funeral prayers".
(Mirza Mahmud, Haqiqat un Nubuwwat, P. 192).
Out of so many signs that have been foretold is there a single one which
can be microscopically traced into the personality of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Qadiani in his life or deeds he performed?. Surely not. Then what sort of
a counterfeit Messiah is Mirza Qadiani in whom not a single micro indication
is present. Just look at one fore-telling by the holy
Prophet(SAW) that in Messiah's times
all religions will be dead and only Islam will exist. But during the
false messiahship of Mirza Qadiani what to say of all the world religions
getting extinct, there was one mosque in Qadian which had gone under Sikh
possession, but which could not be liberated by him. It is now eighty years
that he died, but his followers are not even as much as 'salt in flour'.
Even sweepers are more in numbers than the Qadianis.
Tell me now, are you still proud of your numbers?. If your unrelenting
presumptuousness prevents you from opening your eyes and prompts you to boast
I can only repeat what Allah's
"When you become shameless then do what you like".
Explanation No. 3
Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, I shall now beat you over statistics, because I
have every sort of arrow in my quiver with which I shall lay your
Jama'at flat on every ground.
If your supposed numerical abundance is an indication of Allah's support
to the religion of Qadianis, then this support is available more to the
Christians. Actually, it was your ill-omened Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani who
helped the Christians to achieve numerical superiority over your people.
I give population figures of Christians in the very home district of Mirza
Qadiani, that is district of Gurdaspur (India), taken from Muhammadia
Note: Even during 1891 to 1911, when Mirza was a contemporary figure till
1908, "busy in eradicating Christianity", the Christians multiplied tenfold
from 2,400 to 23,365!
Your daily newspaper, 'Al-Fazl Qadian, dated 19th June, 1941, says:
"Daily 224 men of different religions in India are becoming Christians".
This means 81,760 men were converted annually. If this is calculated from
1941, it works out to 39,24,480 individuals during the last 48 years.
The increase in Christian population in Pakistan is occasionally published.
It is said Christians were 80,000 in both wings of Pakistan at the time of
Partition in 1947. In 1951, they were 432,000 in West Pakistan which increased
to 584,000 by 1961 and 908,000 by 1972. The President and Secretary of Christian
Organization claimed a population of 6 million in 1976. At this rate how
many more might have been added to it by 1989, you can imagine.
Recently, a report came from Bangladesh that 500,000 left Islam to join
Christianity. For the African countries, you are not ignorant. Over there,
whole populations and settlements fell en block into missionary nets. Keeping
these statistics in front of you, tell me if numerical strength of your party
has any proportion worth the name; not even a distant comparison. Therefore,
if you call your numbers a proof of Divine support to your Qadianism, can
not the Christians bring the same argument several times stronger and do
the Christians not have a right to assert forcefully: auspicious souls are
joining the holy Order of Jesus Christ in large numbers but blind Mirzais
are still groping in the dark? If you don't think them auspicious then, by
the same measure, Qadiani converts are not auspicious either; nay, they are
perpetual wretches, having fallen a prey into the claws of Qadiani Mirza,
the Dualist-infidel, and having left the cloak of mercy of
Muhammad(SAW) (a blessing for the
entire universe) by preferring Qadiani execration to Islamic blessing.
Explanation No. 4
The numerical advancement of Christianity as mentioned above, is not a proof
that it is enjoying Divine support, but it is a proof that Mirza Qadiani
was an arch-liar because due to his arrogant claim of messiahship, he took
upon himself the job of breaking the 'Cross' of Christianity. He wrote to
Qazi Nazar Hussain, editor of newspaper 'Qul Qut' Bijnor (India):
"My work for which I am standing in this ground is none but this that I will
shatter the pillar of Isa worship and will spread Monotheism instead of Trinity
and exhibit the eminence and dignity of the holy
Prophet(SAW) to the world. Hence,
if even millions of signs may appear from me ,but this real work does not
come to pass through me, then I am a liar. Therefore, why is the world hostile
to me and why does it not see my accomplishment? If I succeed in doing
that work in Islam's support which ought to have been done by the promised
Messiah and the promised Mahdi, then I am truthful and if nothing is achieved,
then let all lo witness that I am a liar,."
(Newspaper 'Badr Qadian, No. 29, Vol. 2, P. 4, Dated 19th, July, 1906)
The world saw the finale of this fake sire: It is now eighty years after
his death, the pillar of Isa worship has not yet crumbled, faith in Trinity
has not yielded to monotheism and Christianity has seen no impediments; only
Mirza's loquacity has gone bottom-side up! It has helped to spiral a
greater ascendancy for the Christians. In consequence, the world must go
on calling Mirza, as he wished to be called, a liar, a liar, a liar, till
his Day of Reckoning!
Explanation No. 5
In order to strike awe into guileless folk, your technique has always been
to put forth false statements. Inter alia, you produce incorrect statistics
and give out those figures which you have yourself fabricated. This habit
of telling lies is not a recent innovation. The sire Mirza Qadian was a past
master at fabricating lies. I say nothing without proofs; Contradict me if
I am wrong.
Mirza, the god-father of the progeny of liars, gave the number of the Qadianis
in several books as follows:
|Tuhaful-Nadwa, P. 8; Oct. 1902
Mawahib-ur-Rahman, P. 87; Jan. 1903
Haqiqat-ul-Wahi, P.117; 1905
Al-Istifta Haqaiqat-ul-Wahi, P.32
The last entry is interesting. It may be related that once a Qadiani
propagandist, from whom the German Herr Goebbles perhaps learnt the art of
concoction, wrote a letter to Mirza from Alexandria (Egypt) in Arabic:
"Your followers have become numerous in this country (Egypt) and they are
as many as pebbles and particles of sand. Not a single man is left here who
has not acted upon your advice and not followed your helpers".
To continue with my comments, if somebody did really write this humbug from
Alexandria (Egypt), Mirza Qadiani lost no time to proclaim it as his miracle.
I am reminded here of a very suitable saying: the stupid believed what the
knave said. But I ask, where is this milliard of multitude today who were
'like pebbles and particles of sand' in Egypt?
The aforesaid were Mirza's machinations. Now see some later manufacturing
regarding Qadiani population which I enumerate:
Qadiani author of 'Qaukab Durry'
Qadiani debater in Munazira Basira
Against this sky-rocketing graph the census of 1931, counted only fifty-five
thousand heads in the Punjab including the Lahori party. Mirza Mahmud Ahmad
Qadiani, while accepting this figure commented as follows:
"You suppose, there live another twenty thousand men of our party in the
rest of India".(Qadiani Mazhab, P. 513).
Thus, to call seventy-five thousand as 7,500,000, ten-thousand per cent
lie. Herr Goebbles couldn't have touched these heights. Mirza Tahir,
better not talk statistics with me.
After establishment of Pakistan, your party gave a false impression to the
world that real sovereignty in Pakistan lay with 'Ameerul Momineen'( ! )
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad and Pakistani rulers were merely his representatives.
I got a proof of it personally when I went on a tour to Indonesia, where
I was told that Qadianis had made it known that all Pakistanis were 'Ahmadis'.
Therefore, anybody going from Pakistan to Indonesia in those days was taken
to be a Qadiani. This misunderstanding was later removed.
Not many years back, your party alleged that Qadianis were one million in
the world against seventy-two million Muslims. This was a hidden hint towards
a holy saying by the holy
Prophet(SAW), "That there shall
be seventy-three sects of Muslims out of which only one will reach salvation
and the rest seventy-two will be consigned to Hell". Thus the Qadianis say
that they are one million and the Muslims are seventy-two million and therefore
the Qadianis will go to Heaven and the Muslims will go to Hell!!
This artifice got quashed when figures for the 1981 Census we released.
Reference, Newspaper 'Jung', Karachi, lath July, 1984. The Qadianis
were counted at 104,244. If the rest of the world is taken into account,
there may be another one hundred thousand elsewhere.
Therefore, you twisted the possible 200,000 to one million. I have just heard
the latest. The graph has jumped from one million to one and a half million,
i.e. 50% increase! Obviously, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, you are cool and composed
over this situation, because who is going to put your figures to a test.
You may go on bawling out your wares as pompously as you like. But an anecdote
comes to my mind here. They say, a rustic posed a question to a mathematician,
once: "Sir, you are renowned for your mathematics, tell me where is the center
of the earth"? The pundit looked askance. The rustic jeered: "Pooh! I am
illiterate, but I know". Saying this, he took his stick and drew a circle
on the ground as best as he could. Planting the stick in the middle of his
drawing he said. "This is the earth's center. If you say no, then go and
measure all sides of the earth".
Just as the rustic knew he could not be challenged, because no one could
measure the radius of the earth from his chosen center, similarly you too
are comfortable in your bombastic. You know that nobody would count the Qadiani
population to put you to naught. True, the mule of falsehood can move with
the lash of lies only. To exult over untruths befits the slaves of the
"Verily Allah does not confer guidance on those who are immoderate and
Explanation No. 6
Your manner of preaching is not in consonance with that of the prophets (Allah's
peace on them). Your principles resemble the "Ismaili Batini" principles,
details of which Hazrat Shah Abdul Aziz Sahib Muhaddis Dehlavi has mentioned
in his book, Tuhfa-e-Athna-e-Ashriya, and your modus operandi is like
that of Christian missionaries, namely, setting up missionary schools, colleges,
hospitals and similar institutions. You offer employment to converts, provide
them girls for marriage and give them day-to-day things of life. Money is
doled out and you resort to all sorts of unhealthy practices. To effectuate
this, you spin webs of lies, falsehoods and exaggerations. Unwary public
in this way is misled by deceit played craftily on them under cover of benefiting
them with scientific technology.
If you go through the holy lives of prophets (Allah's blessing on them),
you shall find none of this crookedness. There is no greed, no worldly motive,
no propaganda stunt. These holy personages invited people to perform virtuous
deeds on the basis of benefits accruable in the Hereafter as the be-all and
end-all. Conduct and Life-style of Holy Prophets
By way of a summary in Khatam un Nabieen (paragraph No. 130), Hazrat
Imam ul Asr Maulana Muhammad Anwar Shah Kashmiri (Allah's mercy on him),
has commented on the lives of the Prophets as lived by them. For your
edification, I produce a translation of an excerpt from it. He says:
"We should study the holy conduct and sacred disposition of the respected
prophets in their life-histories and the Quran Hakeem. If one analyses
whatever is mentioned in their respect by way of questions and answers, it
shall be seen that matters pertaining to these personages were based on the
Reliance, confidence, uprightness, submission, endurance, self-restraint,
resoluteness, magnanimity, modesty, constancy, mildness, dignity, nobleness,
excellence, generosity, penitence, repentance, sincerity, selflessness, purity,
wisdom, mercy, attachment, temperateness in beliefs, coolness of bosom, credence
and intelligence like the dawning day, love and compassion for Creation,
trustworthy, truthful, trustee, kind, clement, chaste, abstinent, neat, clean,
abstemious, recoursing to Allah, faith in invisible resources, disinclined
towards worldly deliciousness in all eventualities, adhering to Allah and
forsaking the rest, disregard of worldly goods, unconcerned with riches,
embarking on heritage of knowledge, dismissing mundane trifles or money,
leaving legacy of learning and noble conduct, abandoning the superfluous,
guarding their tongue, supporting the truth in all cases and circumstances,
and following it up. Their outward appearance conforms to their inward state,
without any breach, deviation or derangement. They don't advance lame excuses,
improper pleas or perverse interpretations, and do not resort to deceitful
stratagems for fulfilling their tasks. They prefer Allah's ways over worldly
contrivances, shun material connections, adore Allah in misfortunes, thanksgiving
and hymning Him in multitudinous situations, remember Him all the time, recite
His Praise every breath, train and teach Allah-gifted knowledge to people
under His Favor with human affability without philosophizing or sermonizing.
In them is found complete surrender, total obeisance, perfect servitude to
Allah and a satisfaction deeply imbedded in constancy. These personages,
during their life in the world, never entertained flattery, never compromised
with unbelievers, never retreated under any paraonic intimidation. Greed,
covetousness or avidity never stigmatized their holy cloak, not an invisible
stain even. Never were they attracted towards desire, lust, ambition or egotism,
except Allah's love. Virtuous deeds, by their performance or knowledge, saw
no variation from them. Argumentation, refutation and altercation were not
their practice. They never blamed people nor lampooned them nor passed derogatory
remarks nor abused them. Impossible, if they ever felt proud over their
perfection or indulged in self-admiration! They never stooped to bragging
or boasting under prompting of selfishness. In short, Divine favor was granted
to them by Allah. Whatever they did was due to Allah's bounty, beyond personal
parameter and sans any human achievement".
Mirza Tahir Sahib, not a single quality quoted above is visible in your
pseudo-prophet. The inverted manner of your preaching and your diametrically
opposed methods are irrefutable proofs of your voidness. But what lesson
can those, who are unable to identify black from white even in broad daylight,
draw from true prophetic demeanor.
Point No. 3
Your Secretary Sahib writes:
"If there was one bit of nobility in you, you should have accepted the challenge
of Mubahala of Imam Jama'at Ahmadiya in a straightforward manner,
so that the world would have known that you are truthful and you would not
have thought of undertaking the path of flight".
In this sentence you have passed two strictures on me, one, that there is
not a bit of nobility in me and secondly, that I have undertaken the path
For the former, I don't need any certificate of nobility from you. Still,
if you say I am ignoble, I don't mind to be called so, because do I not know
that you have sprouted from spill-overs of Mirza Qadian, the same Mirza whose
habit was to use filthy language against his adversaries. Some of his abuses
are listed in the book, Mughallazat-e- Mirza, and what people thought
of him, I quote:
"For use of bawdy terms, obscene words, foul language, abuses and curses,
Mirzaji had obtained exclusive right from the king's court. He is an acknowledged
adept in this art". (Page 70).
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad abused his opponents in such terms as: dogs, sons of bitch,
swine and addressed them as bastards, sons of prostitutes, etc. Therefore,
if the Jama'at of this 'Noble' patriarch calls me ignoble, thanks
indeed for this light epithet.
In this context, I tell you now, Mirza Tahir, about a certain mirror which
nobody else, but your own papa-grande manufactured. How did it get manufactured,
I tell you about it. It started like this: There was a gentleman by name,
Shaikh Akbar (Allah's mercy on him). He wrote a book Fusus ul Hikam
in which he made certain predictions regarding the final birth in mankind.
Explaining the contents of this book your grandpa wrote these words:
"And the final man to be born in mankind shall be a follower of Hazrat Sheesh
(Allah's peace on him). This person will be a repository of secrets of Hazrat
Sheesh. After the birth of this person none will be born in this mankind.
Along with him, a sister shall also be born who shall precede him in birth
and his head will joint the feet of the baby girl. His birth shall be in
China and his language shall be the tongue of his town and (after his birth)
the disease of unproductivity will creep in men and women, that is, there
shall be numerous marriages but no birth of children. This child (when grown
up) will call people towards Allah the Exalted but nobody would listen to
(Tiryaqul Quloob, P. 354).
Mirza Qadiani's old habit was that when any type of prediction caught his
eye, he would mold it upon himself. Therefore, having read the prediction
of Shaikh Akbar, he declared that this related to the 'promised Messiah'.
Since he claimed messiahship for himself, he announced that the prediction
should be related to him. But, in order to do so, one problem arose: the
child would be the last of the mankind with no more births after him and
after his birth all men and women would go barren. How could this prediction
fit upon Mirza because generations and lineage not only continued during
Mirza's times but are also still continuing?! To sort out this anomaly, Mirza
reached the height of his foolishness when he explicated the prediction thus:
"The prediction contains these words also that after the death of that child,
the disease of sterility will infect mankind. It means those born later will
resemble animals and beasts, but real humanity will have disappeared from
the face of the earth. Lawful will not be lawful for them (i.e. in the subsequent
progeny of mankind and prohibitions will not be prohibitions). Therefore,
Resurrection will set upon them". (Ibid, P. 355).
This explication from Mirza Qadiani means that after his own death (1) those
born in mankind shall be without any civility or human virtue; (2) they will
resemble beasts and brutes; (3) they will not discriminate between lawful
and unlawful; (4) that commotional distress of the Doomsday will devolve
over them. Mirza Tahir Sahib, I add nothing to it from my side. What can
I and who am I? It is your own grandpa who has called you so and so. I'll
merely request you kindly to figure out the face of your Secretary Sahib
in this mirror and don't forget to recognize the beastly countenance of your
good self too in this mirror which your sire, the papa-grande manufactured
through his evil genius.
I comment on the situation for the benefit of the Qadianis. If Mirza Qadiani
is the promised Messiah, if people born after his death are brutes, if no
human excellence is left in them except savagery, then establish your own
status, Mirza Tahir Sahib, and along with yours, the status of your party
individuals who were born after Mirza Qadiani's death on 26th May 1908.
Mirza Tahir Sahib, I am sorry your grandpa has included you and all Qadianis
in the category of savages and brutes. He has made you and all Qadianis outcasts
from humanity. Now, there are two alternatives before you all: If you and
your Qadianis want to get back into the fold of humanity then deny your sire
grandpa's Messiahship; otherwise second choice for you and for all Qadianis
is that you prefer to remain beasts, in terms spoken by your grandpa, Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad, in his book as I have quoted him. In case your choice and the
choice of all Qadianis is to remain beasts, then none of you shall have any
civility or human virtue and lawful will not be lawful and unlawful will
not be unlawful for you all. Tell me now, can such human-faced animals possess
nobility?! An animal, because he is an animal, has no concept of legalities
and, therefore, is unable to discriminate between lawful and unlawful, such
as between wife and daughter. Therefore, if I am censured as a person who
does not possess an atom of nobility, how can I take it ill from the mouth
of beastly men?
The second blame which your Secretary Sahib has placed on me is that I am
undertaking a path of flight from Mubahala rendezvous. If a person
has read those of my words which were written in prominent characters in
my original reply to you (vide Reply to Mirza Tahir's Challenge of Mubahala,
P. 27), he must say you are a great liar because, having accepted your
Mubahala Challenge, I had addressed you thus:
"Faqir versus Fascist
Come! Face this Faqir in the ground of Mubahala. Come! Widen
your eyes and openly see the spectacle of my kind master's manifestation
of terrible wrath and ireful indignation falling on you. Allah's
Prophet(SAW) said that if Christians
of Najran had come out for Mubahala not one bird on their trees would
have survived. Come! Come out to see again the miracle of Khatme Nubawwat
of Allah's Prophet(SAW) on the
ground of Mubahala. But I doubt if you will come."
After that, I had predicted your flight from my challenge, "because you know
that will mean your Jumping into the inferno of leaping fire that will lick
every thing. On the contrary you would surely prefer doing the way your father
and grandfather did, rather than stepping into the arena of Mubahala
against this humble Ummati of Allah's
I am glad my prediction of your flight came true. If there is any bit
of honor left in you, it is time you jump into the arena, to show at least
this much to the world that my prediction had gone untrue. But, alas!
Where is that jot of inviolability or that particle of sincerity in the spillover
of the arch-liar pseudo-Messiah. It is futile to have any expectation from
you. Yet, millions of thanks to Allah that my shout-out browbeat you, sending
shivers running down the bones of the sham Messiah's progeny; fear and anxiety
gnawed their hearts at the specter of my Mubahala with Mirza Tahir.
I repeat, your falling into jitters is not due to any excellence on my part,
because I am rather an unworthy and incapable Ummati, but this awe
is a miracle of the truthfulness of our
Prophet(SAW) (My life in sacrifice
"Say, Truth has come and Falsehood has vanished away. Verily Falsehood
is ever bound to perish". (Quran, Al-Isra, 17:81)
Point No. 4
Your Secretary Sahib writes:
"Mubahala is the name of asking for decision through invocation from
Allah, the Exalted, but gathering together of parties (to dispute) at some
specified place is not necessary by the (interpretation) of the verse of
Mubahala. Therefore, your asking to come out at Minar-e-Pakistan or
at some other place on such and such date at such and such time means nothing
but your fleeing away from Mubahala"?
I have just said that I am shouting out at Mirza's progeny to come into the
arena of Mubahala, but they do not. Therefore, who is running away
from the ring? Bravo! Your shamelessness! You are running away yourself and
while running you say: I am running away. Clever is the thief who, when the
house-inmates wake up and shout "thief, thief', also starts shouting "thief,
thief', and thus disappears in darkness. But, Mirza Tahir, your cleverness
will no more pay you dividend. Darkness of night is gone and light of morning
has appeared. The face of arch-liar Messiah's progeny has been search-lighted.
I have written that the Ayah of Quran Hakeem and holy actions of the
Prophet(SAW) both confirm that the
manner of holding a Mubahala requires the two parties to bring out
their children, women and relatives, in an open ground face to face. But
what is the use of quoting references to you because you have neither any
faith in the Quran nor you give any credence to the holy actions of the
personality to whom the Quran was
revealed(SAW). Therefore, you coined
a new sense to the word Mubahala for the sake of your advantage.
But, I will not stop at only saying that, since there is a proverb which
says: take the liar to his mother's house. But, I take you to your grandfather's
house. What did your dear grandpa do? He declared that parties to a
Mubahala must meet by appointment at some fixed place and time, for
a face-to-face confrontation. Listen intently! Here are three examples set
by your grandpa if you have some faith in him.
Example No. 1
In 1886, Mirza Qadiani, your grandfather, invited the Aryans to a
Mubahala and wrote:
"If some Arya (Samaji) having read this whole pamphlet of ours does not want
to leave his obstinacy and does not turn back from his blasphemies, then
on a token received from Allah the Exalted we call him towards
Mubahala".(Surma-e-chashm Arya, p.280).
Again in the same book on pages 300-301, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote:
Last resort is Mubahala to which we have referred earlier. For
Mubahala, it is not necessary to be a reader of the Veda (Hindu religious
book). Yes, he should be a well-mannered renowned Arya who may impress others
also. Hence, if they really consider these teachings of the Vedas as really
correct and true about which we have written in this pamphlet to some extent
and they deem those principles and teachings of Quran-Shareef written
by us in this very pamphlet as wrong and untrue then they may do
Mubahala with us in this regard. And having decided some spot for
Mubahala by Mutual Agreement, the two parties should present themselves on
the fixed date at that Place". Example No. 2
In 1896, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad invited the Christians to a 'Mubahala'
"And the manner of operation for obtaining Divine Decision will be like this
that one respectable padre sahib, selected out of the following padres be
ready to come against me in the ground of contest fixed by Mutual Agreement
and after that, we both present ourselves at the decided spot along with
our respective parties and beseech Allah, the Exalted, by invocating
him that whoever person deserves punishment out of we two as a liar in His
Eyes, then, Allah, the Exalted, may send down that calamity on the liar which
is always sent on liars and deceitful peoples". (Anjam-e-Atham, P. 40).
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad further writes on page 42:
"Therefore, O Padres! See, I am Standing for this work. If you want that
distinction should become apparent between a liar and the truthful through
Allah's Command and Divine Decision then come! So that we fight
against each other in one ground through invocations in order that the
liar is exposed".
At another place Mirza Ghulam Ahmad writes:
"If the Christians hate the word 'accursed', then let it go, but let both
parties supplicate: 'O Lord of the worlds... O Omnipotent, decide between
these two parties in this way that out of the two parties who at this
time are present in the ground of Mubahala, the party who places confidence
in false faith, destroy that (party) within one year by great punishment,
because dying of some persons is better for the sake of salvation of the
(Anjam-e-Atham, P. 33) Example No. 3.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani invited dignified Ulema of Muslim Ummah in these
"Now turning my discourse again towards the real objective, I enter below
names of those Maulvis whom I have called for a Mubahala and again
I put them under oath of Allah, High is His Disposition, that they should
come soon in the ground of Mubahala by fixing a date and time
of Mubahala, and if they do not come and do not abstain from making
accusations of falsehood and infidelity, then they will die under Allah's
(Anjam-e-Atham, P. 68-69).
Mirza Tahir Sahib, you may now learn a lesson from the summary Or the above
Your grandfather, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani:
Calls the Aryans into a Mubahala ground;
Calls the Christians to assemble in a Mubahala ground for fighting
with invocations to obtain Divine Decision)
Calls Muslim Maulvis to enter into a Mubahala ground urgently by fixing
a date and place.
And you, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, don't understand 'tokens' which your grandpa
received from Allah; you don't place confidence in Divine Decision invoked
by your grandpa; nor do you pay respect to Oaths and swearing of your
Therefore, I say, you are avoiding to fix a day for Mubahala or to
fix a venue for it or to come out into the open ground. Hence according to
your grand papa, "if they do not come they will die under Allah's execration".
Tell me now, who will become a target of Allah's execration? If you don't
believe in Quran Hakeem, OK; if actions of the holy
Prophet(SAW) are no arguments for
you, OK; but you should have faith in predictions of your grandpa at least!
How will you escape that torture which he has foretold?
You maintain: "It is not necessary by Ayaat of Mubahala, for parties
in dispute to assemble at some specified place". But why don't you remember
that in your Qadiani Quran, viz., Tazkirah, your grandfather explicated
the Ayaat of Mubahala in these words:
"And people said that this book is full of untruth and Kufr; tell them: Come!
We and you along with our sons, women, and relatives assemble at one place
and then do Mubahala and invoke imprecation upon the liars".
You see, in the Qadiani Quran of your grandpa the same sense of Mubahala
rendezvous has been adopted which I hold, i.e. both parties with their
relatives should collect at one place to curse the liars. Yet, your Secretary
Sahib writes otherwise:
"Our belief is that Allah is present everywhere in the universe and from
His Grasp of Authority no place is outside and no spot without His Sway and
Might. His seat circumscribes earth and sky. Why do you hesitate to address
Allah and pronounce His Curse on the liars and why do you consider the presence
of the concerned parties is necessary".
In reply, I lay down five points:
Firstly: Permit me to say, you have no belief in Allah, no belief
in his Prophet(SAW), no belief in
Quran, no belief even in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani--your grandfather! If
you had belief in Allah, you would not have annulled His Command for meeting
your opponents at one place in Mubahala. If you had belief in the
Prophet(SAW), you would not have
ignored his action by not coming out of your house. If you had belief in
your own sire, the grand-papa, you would not have missed any chance in protecting
his dignity from indignity, his honor from dishonor, which he caused upon
himself through his unbridled abusive honks.
Secondly: Don't side-track! Who denies Omnipresence and Omniscience
of Allah? Point is not this; the point is: Is it not necessary for
parties-in-dispute to meet at one place? Can there be Laan between husband
and wife unless both face each other; can there be Nikah (marriage), unless
both parties are present, personally or by proxy; can a law-suit proceed,
unless both plaintiff and defendant are present in the court personally or
through advocates. On this analogy, Mubahala is also asking Allah
for His Decision on the imprecation of the two opposing parties? Then, why
is their facing each other at one place deemed unnecessary?
Thirdly: A Qadiani must mold Quran and Hadith to his own will and
wish. In your Qadiani Quran, new 'Ayaat' were added by the arch-liar,
Mirza Qadiani, e.g.
"We sent it down near Qadian." (Tazkirah, P. 74)
Mirza's another flabbergasting addition in the holy Quran was (two goats
will be slaughtered); to precede and rhyme with (then which of the favors
of your lord will ye deny) in Surah Ar-Rahman. What a rustic homily
from Mirza to confuse and overawe his followers! This ambiguous addition
meaning (two goats will be slaughtered) with the Quranic Ayat of Surah
Ar-Rahman which is tantamount to ridiculing the holy Quran. Besides
these additions, which this great Dualist-infidel, Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani,
made in Quran Hakeem, several Ayaat and Ahadith have been subjected
to deliberate word omissions, alterations, distortions and transpositions
of meanings. Tenor of many a 'Sharia' phraseology has been twisted
to suit personal inclinations and sacrificed on the altar of selfishness.
This is called Dualist-infidelity and it is the same you are demonstrating
when defining Mubahala to cover up your cowardice.
Quran Hakeem pronounces that both parties should be asked to come
out in the ground of Mubahala along with their relatives and both
should jointly implore Allah for His Execration to fall over the liars. When
this has been done, wait for the decision from Divine Court. Your grandfather
has also said so, while explaining the Ayaat of Mubahala from
his Qadiani Quran, and I repeat his words:
"Tell them: Come! We and you along with our sons, women, and relatives and
assemble at one place, then do Mubahala and invoke imprecation upon
But you, Mirza Tahir Ahmad Sahib, would not listen to your grandpa and would
not present yourself before the divine Court but would remain sitting in
your house and go on honking your wares from there. Tell me is your action
not a contempt of the Divine court? Is this not making a fun of
Mubahala? To mount up this sacrilege, you ask obedient Muslims
to join you in this blasphemy. Allah protect us.
Fourthly: Because you are a run-away from Pakistan, therefore as
a fugitive, I do see your point in hesitating to return. All right, I make
a change. Go ahead and announce a date, place and time in London itself.
This humble faqir will, Insha Allah, present himself over there
along with his associates. But in case you are afraid to go to London and
don't want to step outside your Caliphate parameter, I concede further; All
right, let us meet in your 'London Islamabad' precincts. This humble faqir
will present himself there also at your Center in the U.K. at your appointed
time and date and as many associates as you will say will be brought along,
one lakh, two lakh, ten lakh, twenty lakh. But preservation of peace shall
be your responsibility.
At that spot, I shall use the same words for Mubahala which Maulana
Abdul Haq Ghaznavi, (Allah's mercy on him), spoke in the face of your grandpa
and which paled him down. The words will be:
"Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani and his followers are all liars, Kafir, apostates,
impostors, cheats, unbelievers and Dualist-infidels".
Now see, have I left out any of your objections unsolved? I have covered
up everything for you therefore hurry up! Still if you back out, I put you
to shame in the very words spoken by your grandpa who said in very clear
"I put you under oath of Allah, High is His Disposition, that you should
come soon in the ground of Mubahala by fixing date and time of
Mubahala, otherwise you will die under Allah's Execration".
Fifthly: As your well-wisher, I submit that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani
has been decreed a liar by the Divine Court many times. Therefore, there
is no use of a Mubahala for you. What you should do is that you surrender
to earlier decisions and forsake Mirza, the arch-liar. You may do one hundred
Mubahalas, but Allah's ways do not change; the result will be the
same as before.
How To Seek Allah's Guidance
Remember the door of appeal to Allah for His forgiveness is still open. Before
you die, offer your repentance from Qadiani dogmas and cling to the benevolence
of the holy Prophet(SAW), the mercy
of the worlds.
I tell you and also your Jama'at of a simple way for obtaining Allah's
guidance: Recite Darood Shareef 313 times before going to sleep and
weep bitterly, in solitude, before Allah, uttering these words:
'Ya Allah! In the name of Your mercy and by the grace of Your benevolent
Prophet(SAW) grant us guidance to
come out of deviations and pardon us for all those errors of faith and practices
which we have committed so far!'
If any person belonging to your Jama'at, or you yourself, acted upon
my advice, I am certain Insha Allah, a vista of true Guidance shall
certainly open up before him.
Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi