| [qadianism] negative evidence showing there can be no prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.) By Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey @mailcity.com |
|
Some questions to ask qadianis: 1. Allah mentioned the coming of prophets in earlier revelations. He didn't mention any such coming in all of the Holy Qur'an, revealed over a period of 22 years. Why? 2. There is voluminous evidence that Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned the coming of a reviver of religious sciences in each century; he also mentioned the return of Isa (p.b.u.h.). But there is no evidence that he ever mentioned the coming of a new prophet after him. Why? 3. There are no dua's to ask for the coming of a new prophet in times of trouble. Why? 4. Even in the worst of times, under the Mongol hordes, or other calamities, there is no evidence that any Muslim ever asked Allah to send us another prophet. Why? 5. For 1,300 years before the qadianis, no school of thought emerged among the Muslims that believed in the coming of a new prophet. Why? 6. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned specifically that he would be followed by 30 false prophets. He did not mention that even one true prophet would follow him, or provide us with any indication of how such a new prophet should evidence himself. Surely Rasulullah (s.a.w.) knew that telling us about many false prophets without telling us how to distinguish between the true and the false would confuse us. Unless, of course, there were no new prophets to come after him. Why? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism