[qadianism] negative evidence showing there can be no prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
By Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey @mailcity.com
6:58pm
Wed
3
Feb

Some questions to ask qadianis:

1. Allah mentioned the coming of prophets in earlier revelations.
He didn't mention any such coming in all of the Holy Qur'an, 
revealed over a period of 22 years. Why?

2. There is voluminous evidence that Rasulullah (s.a.w.) 
mentioned the coming of a reviver of religious sciences in each
century; he also mentioned the return of Isa (p.b.u.h.). But 
there is no evidence that he ever mentioned the coming of a 
new prophet after him. Why?

3. There are no dua's to ask for the coming of a new prophet in 
times of trouble. Why?

4. Even in the worst of times, under the Mongol hordes, or other
calamities, there is no evidence that any Muslim ever asked 
Allah to send us another prophet. Why?

5. For 1,300 years before the qadianis, no school of thought 
emerged among the Muslims that believed in the coming of a new 
prophet. Why?

6. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned specifically that he would be 
followed by 30 false prophets. He did not mention that even one
true prophet would follow him, or provide us with any indication
of how such a new prophet should evidence himself. Surely 
Rasulullah (s.a.w.) knew that telling us about many false 
prophets without telling us how to distinguish between the true
and the false would confuse us. Unless, of course, there were 
no new prophets to come after him. Why?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism