| [qadianism] Re: negative evidence showing there can be no prophet By Muzaffar, Ahmad @Gateway.com |
|
Answer to the questions by Mr. Umar Asdil. I received some sayings from another Ahmadi through this forum proving that Muslim scholars did believe that their can be a prophet after Muhammad. I hope that u will receive a lot of them. What I want to say is that u r expecting Eissa (PBUH) to come according the teachings of the Holy prophet (PBUH). So why don't u believe in it that he has arrived. I think that the only thing that u should look for is the proof that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is telling the truth or not. I protest changing the name of Rabwah, as it is not legal to change the name of a place without the consent of the residents. Thanks Muzaffar Ahmad > -----Original Message----- > From: Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey [SMTP: umarantiqa-@mailcity.com ] > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 10:23 AM > To: qadianis-@egroups.com > Subject: [qadianism] negative evidence showing there can be no > prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.) > > Some questions to ask qadianis: > > 1. Allah mentioned the coming of prophets in earlier revelations. He > didn't mention any such coming in all of the Holy Qur'an, revealed over a > period of 22 years. Why? > > 2. There is voluminous evidence that Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned the > coming of a reviver of religious sciences in each century; he also > mentioned the return of Isa (p.b.u.h.). But there is no evidence that he > ever mentioned the coming of a new prophet after him. Why? > > 3. There are no dua's to ask for the coming of a new prophet in times of > trouble. Why? > > 4. Even in the worst of times, under the Mongol hordes, or other > calamities, there is no evidence that any Muslim ever asked Allah to send > us another prophet. Why? > > 5. For 1,300 years before the qadianis, no school of thought emerged among > the Muslims that believed in the coming of a new prophet. Why? > > 6. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned specifically that he would be followed by > 30 false prophets. He did not mention that even one true prophet would > follow him, or provide us with any indication of how such a new prophet > should evidence himself. Surely Rasulullah (s.a.w.) knew that telling us > about many false prophets without telling us how to distinguish between > the true and the false would confuse us. Unless, of course, there were no > new prophets to come after him. Why? > > > Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com > Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://personal.lycos.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism > Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism