[qadianism] Re: Fwd: negative evidence showing there can be no prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloske @mailcity.com
00:32am
Mon
8
Feb

I trust that my recent posts on Isa (A.S.) clarifies that Mirza could not
possibly be identified as the second coming of Isa, because Mirza does 
not meet the qualifications.
--

On Fri, 05 Feb 1999 07:51:27   umaraadil wrote:
>> From: "Muzaffar, Ahmad" 
>> To: "'qadianism@egroups.com'" 
>> Subject: [qadianism] Re: negative evidence showing there can be no
>prophet
>>  after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
>> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:58:00 -0600
>> Message-ID: <0D7E16B6111FD111BC760000C110F86EC1BB4D@nsc-117.gw2k.com>
>> 
>> Answer to the questions by Mr. Umar Asdil.
>> I received some sayings from another Ahmadi through this forum proving
>that
>> Muslim scholars did believe that their can be a prophet after Muhammad. I
>> hope that u will receive a lot of them.
>> What I want to say is that u r expecting Eissa (PBUH) to come according
>the
>> teachings of the Holy prophet (PBUH). So why don't u believe in it that
>he
>> has arrived. I think that the only thing that u should look for is the
>proof
>> that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is telling the truth or not.
>> 
>> I protest changing the name of Rabwah, as it is not legal to change the
>name
>> of a place without the consent of the residents.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Muzaffar Ahmad
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From:	Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey [SMTP:umarantiqad@mailcity.com]
>> > Sent:	Wednesday, February 03, 1999 10:23 AM
>> > To:	qadianism@egroups.com
>> > Subject:	[qadianism] negative evidence showing there can be no
>> > prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
>> > 
>> > Some questions to ask qadianis:
>> > 
>> > 1. Allah mentioned the coming of prophets in earlier revelations. He
>> > didn't mention any such coming in all of the Holy Qur'an, revealed over
>a
>> > period of 22 years. Why?
>> > 
>> > 2. There is voluminous evidence that  Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned the
>> > coming of a reviver of religious sciences in each century; he also
>> > mentioned the return of Isa (p.b.u.h.). But there is no evidence that
>he
>> > ever mentioned the coming of a new prophet after him. Why?
>> > 
>> > 3. There are no dua's to ask for the coming of a new prophet in times
>of
>> > trouble. Why?
>> > 
>> > 4. Even in the worst of times, under the Mongol hordes, or other
>> > calamities, there is no evidence that any Muslim ever asked Allah to
>send
>> > us another prophet. Why?
>> > 
>> > 5. For 1,300 years before the qadianis, no school of thought emerged
>among
>> > the Muslims that believed in the coming of a new prophet. Why?
>> > 
>> > 6. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned specifically that he would be followed
>by
>> > 30 false prophets. He did not mention that even one true prophet would
>> > follow him, or provide us with any indication of how such a new prophet
>> > should evidence himself. Surely Rasulullah (s.a.w.) knew that telling
>us
>> > about many false prophets without telling us how to distinguish between
>> > the true and the false would confuse us. Unless, of course, there were
>no
>> > new prophets to come after him. Why?
>> > 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism