| [qadianism] Re: Fwd: negative evidence showing there can be no prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)|
Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloske @mailcity.com
I trust that my recent posts on Isa (A.S.) clarifies that Mirza could not
possibly be identified as the second coming of Isa, because Mirza does
not meet the qualifications.
On Fri, 05 Feb 1999 07:51:27 umaraadil wrote:
>> From: "Muzaffar, Ahmad"
>> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'"
>> Subject: [qadianism] Re: negative evidence showing there can be no
>> after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
>> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 09:58:00 -0600
>> Message-ID: <0D7E16B6111FD111BC760000C110F86EC1BB4D@nsc-117.gw2k.com>
>> Answer to the questions by Mr. Umar Asdil.
>> I received some sayings from another Ahmadi through this forum proving
>> Muslim scholars did believe that their can be a prophet after Muhammad. I
>> hope that u will receive a lot of them.
>> What I want to say is that u r expecting Eissa (PBUH) to come according
>> teachings of the Holy prophet (PBUH). So why don't u believe in it that
>> has arrived. I think that the only thing that u should look for is the
>> that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is telling the truth or not.
>> I protest changing the name of Rabwah, as it is not legal to change the
>> of a place without the consent of the residents.
>> Muzaffar Ahmad
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey [SMTP:email@example.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 10:23 AM
>> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> > Subject: [qadianism] negative evidence showing there can be no
>> > prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
>> > Some questions to ask qadianis:
>> > 1. Allah mentioned the coming of prophets in earlier revelations. He
>> > didn't mention any such coming in all of the Holy Qur'an, revealed over
>> > period of 22 years. Why?
>> > 2. There is voluminous evidence that Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned the
>> > coming of a reviver of religious sciences in each century; he also
>> > mentioned the return of Isa (p.b.u.h.). But there is no evidence that
>> > ever mentioned the coming of a new prophet after him. Why?
>> > 3. There are no dua's to ask for the coming of a new prophet in times
>> > trouble. Why?
>> > 4. Even in the worst of times, under the Mongol hordes, or other
>> > calamities, there is no evidence that any Muslim ever asked Allah to
>> > us another prophet. Why?
>> > 5. For 1,300 years before the qadianis, no school of thought emerged
>> > the Muslims that believed in the coming of a new prophet. Why?
>> > 6. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) mentioned specifically that he would be followed
>> > 30 false prophets. He did not mention that even one true prophet would
>> > follow him, or provide us with any indication of how such a new prophet
>> > should evidence himself. Surely Rasulullah (s.a.w.) knew that telling
>> > about many false prophets without telling us how to distinguish between
>> > the true and the false would confuse us. Unless, of course, there were
>> > new prophets to come after him. Why?
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism