[qadianism] Re: Fwd: negative evidence showing there can b
By aa3 @axe.humboldt.edu

Mr. McKlosky: Could you tell me the tests you applied to determine whether
Mirza Sahib was or not a true prophet of God. For your information Quran
mentions some tests. (1) A prophet appears when there is sin all over. (2).
The person appointed a prophet has never told a lie before he declared
himself to be God's appointee. (3) His mission always succeeds even when the
whole world opposes him. These tests are derived from Quran where God,
almighty tells Muhammad (SAS) to put up these as the proof of his
prophethood. Could you please tell me the tests you applied.

>> Reply-to:      qadianis-@egroups.com 
>> To:            qadianis-@egroups.com 
>> Date:          Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:58:52 -0000
>> From:          "Umar Aadil Abdul Rahman McKloskey" < umarantiqa-@mailcity.com >
>> Organization:  MailCity  (http://www.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
>> Subject:       [qadianism] Re: Fwd:  negative evidence showing there can
be no prophet after Rasulullah (s.a.w.)
>> I trust that my recent posts on Isa (A.S.) clarifies that Mirza could not
possibly be identified as the second coming of Isa, because Mirza does not
meet the qualifications.
>If we had internet at the time of the Holy Prophet Mohammad (peace 
>and blessings of Allah be on him) the Meccans might have posted
>the same message ...

Abdul Aziz
School of Business & Economics
Humboldt State University

eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism