[qadianism] mirza qadiani in the mirror of his own writings
By umaraadil @excite.com

source: http://www.muslim.net/islam/ahmedi.html

In the Name of Allah, most Compassionate, most Merciful 

Mirza Qadiani in the Mirror of his Own Writings

Truth and untruth are two on-going serials of the world. But Allah,
Exalted in Munificence, has bestowed some distinctive factors 
enabling a man of ordinary understanding and common sense to 
identify one from the other. Praise to Him. 

Mirza Qadiani of Qadian (India) made a number of claims for 
himself, from being a 'Revivalist' to being a 'Prophet'. The
falsehood or otherwise of a claim is easily identifiable 
through several tokens of cognizance which Allah, the Exalted,
has laid down. 

But the easiest pointer, readily available, is Mirza Qadiani’s 
own writings about which he himself said that his writings were
a touchstone to check upon the veracity of his claims. I, 
therefore, invite readers to go through his written statements
and judge for themselves. 

Here are presented 22 excerpts from Mirza Qadiani’s writings. You
would see in these that Mirza Qadiani challenges the world to 
prove him a liar. He is bold about it.  I expect my brethren to
test his metal in a cool unprejudiced manner. 

I pray to Allah, the Exalted, to grant us His Favor in identifying
truth as truth and untruth as untruth. 


(1) Mirza Qadiani wrote in a letter to Qazi Nazar Hussain, Editor,
Newspaper 'Qul-Qul' Bijnor, (India): 

"Those persons who come from Allah's side.... they do achieve
essential intent of their 'sending down and do not die till the
purpose of their commission is not manifested". 

"My mission for which I am standing in this field is this
very one that 1 (a) topple the pillar of worship of Isa, (b) 
spread monotheistic doctrine in place of Trinity, (c) and 
display dignity and glory o the holy Prophet (SAW) before the

"Therefore I am a liar if I fail in the manifestation of this
essential intent, notwithstanding millions of tokens coming forth
from me.  "Why is the world, therefore, inimical to me? And
why does it not see my end? If I manage to succeed in doing in 
support of Islam that work which the promised Messiah or the 
promised Mahdi should have done, then I am truthful.  And if 
nothing happens by the time I am dead then let everybody be 
witness that I am a liar.
    (Newspaper, 'Badr,' Qadian, Volume 2, page 4, July 19,1906). 


How far did Mirza Qadiani succeed in his mission is recounted
in the official newspaper of Qadianis, Al Fazl,' in its issue
dated June 19,1941, on page 5. It says: 

"Do you know, there are 137 Christian Missions operating in
India, i.e., Head Missions.  Number of their branches is many 
more. More than 1800 'Priests' are working in the head missions.
There are 403 hospitals in which 500 doctors are working There 
are 43 printing presses and about 100 newspapers are printed in
different languages. They are running 51 Colleges, 617 High 
Schools and 61 Training Colleges where 60,000 students study.
In the (Christian) 'Salvation Army' there are 308 European and
2886 Indian priests. Under it (the 'Army') there are 507 
Primary Schools in which 18,675 students study Eighteen 
colonies and 11 Dailies are their own. Under different 
departments of this Army 3,290 men are nourished. Result of 
these efforts and sacrifices is that it is said that 224 
persons of different religions are being daily converted to
Christianity. Against this, what are the Musalmans doing? 
Perhaps they do not consider this work worth their attention.
Qadianis should think what is the position of their own efforts
against such widespread net of Christian missionaries. We have 
only two dozen preachers in the whole of India and the difficult
conditions under which they are working, we know that too". 

This is the evidence produced by a Qadiani newspaper, 33 years
after Mirza Qadiani’s death! It shows that Mirza s claim did 
no damage to Christianity Monotheism did not flourish at the 
cost of Trinity. His effort to stop the spread of Christianity

Thus Mirza Qadiani’s statement: "Therefore I am a liar if
I fail in the manifestation of this essential intent..... And
if nothing happens by the time I am dead then let everybody be
witness that I am a liar" is a lie self-proved.

(2) Mirza writes in Zamima Anjam-e-Atham: (Pages 30-35). 

"If within seven years, a distinct effect of my efforts does
not appear by Allah's support in service of Islam and, since 
death of false religions is essential on the hands of Messiah, 
if this death of false religions does not come by through me, 
i.e., if Allah, the Exalted, does not reveal those tokens 
through my hands which shall enhance Islam's success, as a result
of which Islam starts to enter from all sides annihilating the 
void Christian Divinity and the world catching on a different 
hue, then, I swear by Allah that I shall consider myself a 


Mirza wrote the above in January, 1897, or thereabout. In other
words his promised seven years' limit closed in 1903. By that 
year Mirza had to fulfill his promise to substantiate his 
truthfulness, failing which he had sworn himself to be a liar.
Now, readers know that nothing of that sort happened and his 
promise did not materialize according to the time-scale which
he himself had stipulated. Thus Mirza is a self-proclaimed liar.

(3) It so happened during Ramadhan-ul-Mubarak in the year 1311 
Hijra that lunar eclipse occurred on the 13th and solar eclipse
on the 28th. Both eclipses chanced to fall during the same month.
Mirza announced this phenomena as a proof of his 'Mahdviat'. He
declared that this supernatural abnormality was a special sign 
for his sake only and which had never occurred before during 
lifetime of any other claimant to Mahdviat, Masihiat or 

In Magazine, 'Anwar-ul-Islam' (p. 47) Mirza wrote: 

"Since the times that this world was created never did lunar
and solar eclipses get together during the times of any claimant
of Prophethood/ Messengership/Muhaddathiat. If somebody says they
have conjoined then burden of proof lies on him". 

"It never happened and certainly never happened from the 
start of the world till today that lunar and solar eclipses 
conjoined in this manner in Ramadhan and that some claimant to
Prophethood, Messengership or Muhaddathiat was present at that
time." (Page 40.) 


Mirza Qadiani’s lack of knowledge deserves pity. From the years
Hijra 18 to Hijra 1312, lunar and solar eclipses have conjoined
sixty times in Ramadhan alone; during these thirteen centuries 
there have been not one but dozens of claimants of Prophethood 
and Mahdviat.  But Allah, the Exalted, willed that Mirza be 
proved a liar from his own ignorance. 

Therefore Allah, the exalted, made him write out this challenge: 

"If these cruel Maulvis can produce an evidence of this type
of conjunction of eclipses in the times of any claimant, they 
should come out with it. Undoubtedly, I shall go down as a liar,
by this".
  (Appendix, 'Anjam-e-Atham,' page 48). 

Here I produce evidence, not one but four. 

1) In Hijra 117, lunar and solar eclipses conjoined in month of
Ramadhan in the times of a claimant, by name "Treef' who was
living in Aljazair. 

2) Again, Hijra 127 saw a conjunction of the eclipses and at 
that time a person called Saleh, son of Treef, was claimant of

3) A conjunction again occurred in 1267 Hijra in Iran where
Mirza Ali Muhammad Bab was blowing his trumpet of Mahdviat for
seven years. 

4) The Hijra of 1311 was again the year of conjunction when 
Mahdi Sudani was spreading his cult of Mahdviat in Sudan. More
historical proofs are available in respect of such phenomenal
conjunctions in the lifetime of many claimants of prophethood
and Mahdviat. For details refer to the following books: 
   1) 'Doosri Shadadat-e-Aasmani' by Maulana Abu Ahmad. 
   2) 'Aimma-e-Talbis' & Raees-e-Qadian ' by Maulana
      Abul Qasim Dilawari. 

But the above four evidences are sufficient to prove Mirza Qadiani

(4) Mirza wrote in 'Izala-e-Auham ': (p. 190, 1st edition; p. 79,
 5th edition.) 

"O Brethren of Deen and theologians of inviolable Law! 
Listen, you people to my submissions intently; that the claim of
the promised similar, which this humble has made, has been taken
as the so-called promised Messiah by unwitted folks.... I have 
not certainly made this claim that I am Messiah, son of Maryam.
The person putting this blame on me is a downright slanderer
and a liar". 


The above clarifies the position. Mirza admits he was NOT the
promised Messiah and he confirms that those who consider him 
so, are 'unwitted folks, downright slanderers and liars'.

(5) Mirza wrote in Tuhfatun Nadwah: (Page 5). 
1) "If I don't have knowledge of hidden things, then I am a 
2) "If death of Ibn-e-Maryam is not testified by Quran, then
   I am a liar; 
3) "If Hadith-Mairaj did not make Ibn-e-Maryam sit among the
   dead souls, then I am a liar; 
4) "If Quran did not declare in Sura 'Noor' that caliphs of
   this Ummat shall be from this very Ummat, then I am a liar; 
5) "If Quran did not give me the name of Ibn-e- Maryam, then
   I am a liar".


Each and every claim above is wrong. Lies stand proved.

(6) Mirza wrote in Tuhfatun Nadwah (Page 4):
"Allah, the Exalted, in His Holy Book says:.. ....That is, 
if this (person) will be telling lies he will be destroyed
while you will be seeing him. His falsehood shall kill him. 
But if he is truthful then some of you shall become a target
of his predictions and will depart from this mortal place while
he will be seeing them. Now, test me on this basis which is in 
God's words and evaluate my claims". 


We are ready to evaluate Mirza Qadiani’s claim on the basis 
set by him and draw these conclusions: 

l) Mirza engaged himself against Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi in
an imprecation of Mubahala. Right in front of his adversary's 
eyes Mirza met his doom. His falsehood killed him. 

2) During a tête-à-tête with another opponent, by name Maulana
Sanaullah, Mirza Qadiani indulging in curses, implored Allah to
take away first the life of whosoever was a liar. And lo! Mirza
died first while Maulana Sanaullah lived on to see him dead 

3) Mirza Qadiani’s rival-in-love was Sultan Muhammad Sahib. In 
burning jealously Mirza died of Cholera while Sultan Muhammad 
lived on after Mirza Qadiani death.

4)Another opponent was Doctor Abdul Hakeem Khan. Mirza told him
of the drawn sword of the Angel of Death hovering over his head
and cursed him: 
  "O my Provider! decide between the Liar and the Truthful!" 
'Liar and the Truthful!' And lo! Mirza died before Doctor Sahib's
very eyes as a veritable liar! 

The evidences of these four eye-witnesses amply testify Mirza
Qadiani’s falsehood in accordance with the standards which he
himself set forth. 

(7) On July 10, 1888, Mirza came forward to notify his 
"revelation foretelling", as follows: 

   "That Absolute Omnipotent has told me:" 

   "Start negotiations for the elder daughter (Muhammadi
   Begum) of that person (Ahmad Baig). In case of declination
   from Nikah, the end of that girl will be extremely bad and
   if she will be married to another person he, within two 
   and a half years from and similarly father of that daughter
   within three years, will die". 

   "Then in those days. attention was applied again and 
   again for further clarification and details. It came to be
   known that God Almighty determined that He will bring the
   elder daughter (Muhammadi Begum) of that person (i.e. Ahmad
   Baig) into Nikah of this humble self after removal of each 

   "Be it clear to the evil-minded that in order to judge our
   truthfulness or falsehood there can be no greater touchstone 
   of test than our predictions".
     (Majmua'i-e-Ishtharat Vol. I, pp. 157-159). 


This touchstone, which Mirza settled for himself to ascertain his
truthfulness, has come very handy. 

On April 7, 1892, Ahmad Baig married his daughter, Muhammadi Begum,
to one of his relatives namely Sultan Muhammad, resident of village
Patti District Lahore.

Now, in accordance with Mirza Qadiani’s so-called divine

1) Muhammadi Begum ought to have been widowed by Oct. 6, 1894, 
but Allah, the Exalted, kept her safe from Mirza Qadiani’s evil
eye and the couple lived happily together for no less than 57 
years, i.e., 16 years in the lifetime of Mirza and 41 years 
after his death.  From 1949 till 1966, Muhammadi Begum lived
as a widow. In this way, she escaped the clutches of Mirza 
Qadiani’s 'divine revelation', 41 years earlier. 

2) Sultan Muhammad should have died six months earlier than his
father-in-law but by Allah's grace he lived for 57 years after 

3) Ahmad Baig should have died after the death of his son-in-law 
and ought to have witnessed his daughter's widowhood and 
destitution but he departed earlier from the world, leaving his
daughter and son-in-law happy in their life. 

4) Each and every hindrance for Nikah between Mirza and the lady
was destined to be removed by God, as per Mirza Qadiani’s 
'repeated attentions to the Absolute Omnipotent' for bringing
her into Nikah of that 'humble self. YET sorry! The Absolute 
Omnipotent did not help Mirza one bit, although he pursued the
matter relentlessly. Poor Mirza failed miserably. The 'angel of
death' wielded 'sword' over Mirza and he expired on May 26, 
1908. Alas! he departed, burying pangs of love in his heart into
his grave, coupled with heart-burnings of jilt. 

5) According to Mirza Qadiani’s own words those who do not put 
his predictions on the touchstone of test for falsehood are 
'the evil-minded'. 

(8) On the occasion of Nikah announcement of Muhammadi Begum, 
on July 10, 1888, Mirza prefaced the following two-verse piece
on top of his communication: 

   Allah's Divine Power will strangely show itself up; When the 
   end result of my predictions will be visible. Distinction 
   between truth and falsehood is to appear; 

   Someone will get honor and some, disgrace. 
    (Majmua-e-Ishtiharat, Vol.1 , p. 153). 


Result of predictions was seen on 26th May, 1908, in Mirza 
Qadiani’s death. Allah's Divine Power showed itself up on that
day. Despite his twenty years' continuous efforts along with
his 'revelation' hoaxes, Mirza was deprived of Muhammadi Begum.
In this way, truth and falsehood became distinct in the wake of
which the lady was honored and Mirza disgraced. Who was a liar?

(9) Mirza made several predictions in the case of Muhammadi 
Begum. Her parents, ignoring all these predictions, settled her
Nikah elsewhere. Mirza was consumed with lover's cast-off 
jealousy. Not controlling himself, he blurted forth a letter
to her paternal uncle, Mirza Ali Sher Baig, who was Mirza 
Qadiani’s brother-in-law as well. He wrote:  

  "Now, I have heard that the girl's Nikah is going to be 
  solemnized on the 2nd or the 3rd Eid ..... Participants in 
  this Nikah are my great enemies. Nay, they are great enemies
  of Islam.  They want Christians to laugh at us and Hindus to
  make merry but they don't care a bit for the Deen of Allah 
  and the Prophet". 

  "From their side, they are strongly determined to disgrace
  me and blacken my face. They are about to strike me with a 
  sword. Now, to save me is the work of Allah, the Exalted. If I
  am His, He will surely save me. They want me to be dishonored 
  and to have my face blackened. God is Absolute. He may blacken
  the face of whomsoever He likes but, now, they want to push me
  into fire". 


Ah! The restlessness of Mirza for Muhammadi Begum and the 
coldness of her relatives.  Woe betide! Enemies of Allah, enemies
of the Prophet, enemies of Deen and enemies of Mirza are cutting 
into Mirza Qadiani’s core with the dagger of Nikah and turning 
him into a laughing stock of insult for the world. 

Alas Mirza! Aglow with lover's fire! Allah's help, none! 

Mirza bemoans in writhing agony: 

  "If I am His, He will surely save me". 

  Yes if he were His; otherwise, No. A straw from Allah for Mirza! 

(10) When Sultan Muhammad, Mirza Qadiani’s rival for Muhammadi
Begum's hand, did not die within the period fixed by Mirza, he
extended the duration of Sultan life:

   "Well, if not in two and a half years, certainly in my 
   lifetime he will die. I declare that his living or not living
   is the test of my truthfulness or otherwise".

He wrote in Persian:

   (Translation) "But I have not told you that this matter
   has come to a close at this state and that the end result is
   what has appeared or that the fact of prediction has finished
   at that.  The real premise stands on its own. Nobody, by any 
   of his tricks, can evade it. This is fated from Great Allah 
   as inentable destiny (i.e. the predicted death of Sultan
   Muhammad whereby Mirza could consummate his longing for 
   Sultan's wife) and shortly the time of its occurrence will
   come. I swear by that Allah Who raised Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa
   (SAW) for us to make him His best creation that this prediction
   is true and will soon be visible. I make it a proposition for 
   testing my truthfulness or my falsehood. And I have not said 
   it on my own but that my Provider Himself has informed me of 
   it". (Anjam-e-Atham, p.223). 

Mirza declared Sultan Mohammed’s imminent death as a proposition to
test his truthfulness or falsehood, i.e., if Sultan Muhammad died 
in Mirza Qadiani’s lifetime then Mirza was true otherwise he was 
a liar.

What a pity that Mirza was a liar because he died in 1908 and 
Sultan Muhammad died in 1949. 

(11) Mirza wrote in case of Sultan Muhammad: 

  "Remember, if the second part of this prediction does not
  come true (i.e., son-in-law of Ahmad Baig does not die in 
  Mirza Qadiani’s lifetime) then I shall be more wicked than
  every wicked man. O idiots! this is not a human's pretension.
  This is no business of any depraved impostor. Consider this 
  definitely to be God's true promise, the same God Almighty
  Whose words never evade; the same Glorious Provider Whose 
  intentions nobody can stop!"
       (Append ix, 'Anjam-e-Atham' p54) 


Because Sultan Muhammad did not die in Mirza Qadiani’s lifetime,
the undermentioned conclusions are drawn: 

 1) Mirza admits himself to be 'more wicked than every wicked man'. 

 2) His prediction was 'Pretension'. 

 3) His prediction was 'Business of any depraved impostor'. 

 4) If his claim was 'God's true promise' it could not possibly
    'evade' because who 'can stop intentions of the 'Glorious 

 5) A person who does not understand this simple thing, Mirza 
    gives him the title of 'idiot'. 

(12) "I say again and again that quintessence of my prediction
in case of the son-in-law of Ahmad Baig shall be his inevitable 
destiny. Wait for it. If I am a liar then this prediction will 
not be fulfilled and my death will come and if I am truthful then
God Almighty will certainly fulfill it'.
(Marginal note p-31, Anjam-e-Atham) 


How shameful! Ahmad Baig's son-in-law did not die during Mirza
Qadiani’s lifetime. Thus Mirza had said correctly: "If I am
a liar then this prediction will not be fulfilled, and my death
will come.' 

(13) Mirza, in support of his 'heavenly' Nikah, had reasoned out 
from a Prophetic Hadith, (as written by him in 'Anjam-e-Atham ,
p-53 Annex): 

  "For corroboration of this prediction, the holy Prophet of
  Allah (SAW) has also previously predicted: the promised Messiah
  will take a wife and have children. Now it is obvious that this
  mention of marriage and children normally bears no significance
  because every one generally marries and has children. There is 
  no excellence in it. But here marriage means special marriage 
  as a token and by children is meant special children for which
  the prediction of this humble self is there. It looks as if the
  Prophet of Allah(SAW) is answering here the doubts of those 
  black-hearted unbelievers that these sayings will certainly 
  be fulfilled". 


Allah, the Exalted, kept Mirza deprived-of that 'special marriage
and from those 'special children', proving that Mirza Qadiani’s 
claim of So-called promised Messiahship was false and that the 
prophetic prediction did not fit upon him. The holy saying was
with regard to Hazrat Isa (Jesus, peace be on him) that he would
marry and would have children on his second appearance on earth 
Mirza has himself written about those persons who disbelieve his
appearance: The Prophet of Allah (SAW) is answering here the 
doubts of those black-hearted unbelievers that these sayings will
certainly be fulfilled. 

(14) For fifteen days, Mirza carried on arguments with a Christian
Priest, named Abdulla Aatham. Having failed to give him a defeat 
he announced his revelation on 5th June 1893 that within fifteen 
months his adversary would be thrown into haaviya' (the hell) 
unless he returned to the truth. Mirza wrote in this case: 

  "I admit right this time that if this prediction goes false,
  that is, if within fifteen months from this date, the party who 
  is on falsehood in view of Allah, does not fall into 'Haaviya' 
  as death punishment then I am prepared to undergo every type 
  of punishment: disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope 
  around my neck or hang me on the gallows. I am ready for all. I
  swear by the Greatness of Allah's Glory that He will certainly 
  do the same, will certainly do the same, will certainly do the 
  same. Earth and sky my deviate but not His Ordainment. If I am 
  a liar, keep the gallows ready for me and consider me the most 
  accursed of all the accursed persons, evil-doers and Satans".
  (Jung-e-Muqaddas, p-189) 


Mirza Qadiani’s prediction expired on 5th September, 1894 but Atham
neither renounced Christianity nor accepted Islam nor he fell into
"Haaviya" in death punishment. Nothing of the sort happened
and everything sailed smooth. 

Mirza went to the extent of invoking charms over Atham, throwing 
over him spells and witchcraft (ret: 'Seerat-ul-A~ahdi' p-188, 
Vol. 1) but nothing happened. 

On the last day, when this prediction was ending, i.e., 5th
September he implored Allah, cried out and lamented: Ya Allah!
Atham may die, Atham may die, Ya Allah! Atham may die" 
(ret. Newspaper Al- Fazl, dated 20th July 1940). But Atham lived
on.  Magic, charms, witchcraft and spells did him no damage.
Allah rejected Mirza Qadiani’s implorations, lamentations and
curses. Atham grew all the more prosperous!

On the other hand, Mirza had proposed his own punishment as a 
liar: "Disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around 
my neck or hang me on the gallows.. keep the gallows ready for 
me, think of me as the most accursed of all the accursed persons,
evil-doers and Satans". Consequently, how did the opposing 
party carry out this instruction of Mirza Sahib?

It can be guessed by the dirty announcements which were published
on the expiry of the fixed time. What his adversaries did? They 
heaped on Mirza such filthy abusive epithets that it shall be 
indecent to print them here. But a couplet, which became popular
on public tongues may be reproduced here:


Shameless perverse are also in this world, But you. shame-proof,
have surpassed all! 

This was an echo to Mirza Qadiani’s own acknowledgment: "Most
accursed of all the accursed, evil doers and Satans.' Really he 
was so, otherwise how Allah would have failed him before a 'Kafir'

(15) Mirza wrote in Shahadat-ul-Quran: (p-80). 

"In addition to this, there are similar other magnificent
tokens of this humble self on the test list: There is my 
prediction in respect of Munshi Abdulla Atham Sahib Amritsari,
the term of which is fifteen months beginning from 5th June, 
(1893). My other prediction is in respect of the son-in-law of
Mirza Ahmad Baig, resident of Patti, District Lahore, term of 
which has eleven months more from today the 21st September, 
1893. All these matters which are totally beyond human power are
sufficient to identify the true from the liar". 


This is exactly the modus-operandi in which a liar is 
distinguishable from a truthful person, that is, if these
predictions are fulfilled as per duration of their terms then
the teller of the predictions will be considered truthful. As the
predictions failed, therefore Mirza is identified as a proven 
liar. No other argument is necessary to prove Mirza Qadiani’s 

(16) Mirza announced: "In the end, I beseech You, O God! 
Almighty All- Knowing, if these predictions are not from You 
that Atham will be caught in fatal tortures and Ahmad Baig's
elder daughter coming ultimately into Nikah of this humble self
then destroy me with disgrace and disappointment. Efface me, 
perish me with insults, make me permanent target of accursed 
imprecations, please my enemies, accept their prayers if, in
Your estimate, I am a driven outcast, accursed charlatan and
one-eyed anti-Christ impostor ('Dajjal') as my opponents have
understood me, and if that Benevolence of Yours is not with me
which was with...... " (so and so saints and prophets: here
Mirza has named many saints and prophets). 
(Ishtihar dated Oct. 27, 1894, reproduced from Majmu'a Ishtiharat
p-116,Vol. 2). 


Despite these heart-rending entreaties and self-accursements, 
Allah did keep Mirza deprived of Nikah with Muhammadi Begum until
he breathed his last. From this it appears that Mirza, according 
to his own statements, was 'a driven outcast, accursed charlatan 
and one-eyed anti-Christ impostor ('Dajjal') as his opponents have
understood him'. 

Alas! As a result of this self-cursing he perished in disgrace and
disappointment, became a permanent target of accursed imprecations,
his enemies became happy and their prayers were accepted by Allah. 

(17) Mirza Qadiani in his communication to Maulana Sanaullah 
Amritsari wrote: 

"In your paper, you build up this reputation for me that this
person imputes falsely, is a liar and is one-eyed anti-Christ 
impostor ('Dajjal'). I have borne a lot of tortures from you but
endured them patiently........ if I am really a liar, an impostor
and a charlatan, as you remember me in your paper then I will 
perish in your lifetime".  (Advertisement, Molvi Sanaullah
Sahib se Aakhri Faislah, Ref. Majmua-e-lshtiharat, Vol. 3, p. 578.) 


Mirza died on 26th May, 1908, in the lifetime of Maulana Mirza
Qadiani’s words are proved: 
  If I am really a liar, an impostor and a charlatan, as you 
  remember me in your paper then I will perish in your lifetime.
Mirza was a 'truthful' liar, therefore died earlier.

(18) In the same advertisement addressed to Maulana Sanaullah 
Amritsari, Mirza wrote: If that punishment which is not in the
hands of a human being but only in God's Hands, such as plague,
cholera, etc., and similar fatal diseases and if the same do not
descend upon you in my lifetime then I am not god-sent". 


Allah, the Exalted, kept Maulana safe from every amiction in Mirza
Qadiani’s lifetime and fulfilled this proposal of Mirza:. "
Then I am not God-sent." 

(19) Mirza implores Allah in the above-quoted Aakhri Faislah. 

"O God! If this claim of the 'so-called promised Messiah' is
only a false imputation from the 'self in me and in Your eyes I 
am a mischievous liar, then O my dear Master! Humbly I implore 
in Your Audience to put me to death in Maulana Sanaullah's life-
time. Aameen". 

Comments: This prayer of Mirza came to be accepted; Mirza died 
while Maulana Sanaullah lived on. Proved: Mirza was a mischievous
liar in the eyes of Allah the Exalted. Further proved: Mirza's
claim of being 'promised Masih' was false imputation of his 'self
and that Maulana Sanaullah was righteous. 

Would that Mirza had implored Allah for his guidance instead of
his death! Perhaps that would also have been accepted. 

Excerpt No. 20: Mirza further wrote: 

  "O my Omnipotent! O Who has sent me down! Holding the garment
   of Your Sanctity and Mercy only, I beg in Your audience to 
   honor us with a true decision between Maulana Sanaullah and
   myself. And he who in Your eyes is really a mischievous liar,
   lift him from the world in the very lifetime of whosoever is 
   truthful. O Master! do it this Way. Ameen". 

Comments: This request of Mirza was also accepted. Maulana 
Sanaullah was truthful hence Mirza, struck by cholera, was lifted
from the world in Maulana Sanaullah's lifetime. Mirza got from 
Allah what he asked from his mouth. It proved that Mirza was a 
mischievous liar. 

Excerpt No. 21: Mirza wrote in Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, P. 20- 21: 

 "Shaikh Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and other notable opponents may
  hold a Mubahala with me. After the Mubahala, even if one person
  could save himself from my imprecations then I will admit I am 
  a liar". 

Under this arrangement, Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi held a Mubahala
with Mirza. Result was that Mirza died in the lifetime of Maulana 
Sahib. Thus, Mirza's covenant is corroborated: "I am a liar". 

Excerpt No. 22: Mirza's writings show that he was a patient of
'Hyster-malaise.' He said so in conversations also. Doctors 
confirmed it. Others also said about it. Proofs are given below: 

   1."You behold! Hazrat(SAW) had foretold about my illness also which has come to pass likewise:
     He had said that when Masih will descend from the sky he will be wearing two
     saffron-colored sheets of cloth. Therefore, same way, I have two diseases, one in the upper
     part of the body, viz., Hysteromania, and the other, excessive urination, in the lower part".
     (Malfoozat-e-Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, Vol. 8, P. 445); 
   2."My condition is such that, despite my constant involvement in two diseases, I remain
     preoccupied with work that I carry on very late having closed doors of the house at night.
     Although the disease of Hyster-malaise increases as a result, and my head feels more dizzy
     due to wakefulness, yet I don't care and continue with my work". (Ibid. Vol. 2, P. 376); 
   3."Hazrat Khalifat-ul-Masih-ul-Awwal said to hazrat promised Masih: "Your Honor! Ghulam
     Nabi suffers from Melancholia." The honourable was pleased to reply: "In a way, all the
     prophets suffered from Melancholia and I also suffer from the same". (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, P.
     304, Vol. 3); 
   4."Doctor Mir Muhammad Ismail Sahib told me that he had heard many times from hazrat
     sahib, the promised Masih, that he suffered from Hysteria and also mentioned Melancholia.
     But the truth is that signs of nervous disorders developed in him only as a result of his diligent
     mental work and day and night preoccupation with literary compositions. These are often
     seen in patients of Hysteria (and Melancholia) also." (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, Vol. 2, P. 55); 
   5."This disease, having occurred once in the family, was bound to penetrate into the next off-
     spring. Therefore hazrat Khilafat-ul-Masih Thani, Mian Mahmud Ahmad Sahib, told me that
     occasionally, he also got an attack of Hyster-Malaise". (From: Article written by Doctor Shah
     Nawaz Sahib Qadiani, reproduced in Magazine 'Review Of Religions,' Qadian, August,
     1926, P. 11); 
   6."The cause of all his troubles such as vertigo, headache, sleeplessness, heart cramps,
     indigestion, diarrhea, excessive urination and hystermalaise was only one and that was his
     weakness of nerves". (From the magazine: 'Review Qadian, May 1927, P. 26); 
   7."Some patient of Melancholia think: "I am king"; Some think "I am God", some think "I am
     Prophet." (From Bayaz-Noor-ud-Din, P. 212, Vol. 10). 

Comments: We have sufficed here to give only seven opinions and 
findings from all those who are Qadianis and it is possible to give
more opinions as well but for the-sake of brevity we stop. However,
it is confirmed without any doubt that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was 

It shall be worthwhile to give medical opinion of experts of 
Medicine on this disease of Melancholia -- Hyster-Malaise. It
will be noted that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad suffered from them all. 

   1.From: 'Qanoon', Part One, Book three, Author Shaikh-ur-Raees. Boo Ali Seena:
     "Melancholia is that malady in which worries and anxieties take the form of imagined horrors
     and dreads as opposed to the normal. Its cause is atrabilious temperament which takes away
     the entire essence of brain, leaving the patient effectually distracted. Or the other cause of this
     malady is extreme heating-up of the liver called Hyster-malaise. What happens is that
     excrement of victuals and intestinal disorders through vapors collect in the liver and humours
     of the body burn up and take the form of mania. Then black fumes arise from these parts and
     go towards the head. It is this condition which is called melancholic- flatulence,
     melancholic-fumigation or melancholic- hystermalaise". 
   2.From: ' Sharah-ul Asbab wal Alamat-Amraz, Malikhonia'. Author: Allama Burhan ud bin
     "When thoughts and ideas change from the normal path into fears and disorders it is called
     Melancholia.. With some patient this disturbance reaches to such limits that he starts to
     consider himself a Diviner, with a knowledge of hidden things. He informs in advance of what
     is going to happen later.. this disease increases in some patient so much so that he thinks
     himself to have been transformed into an angel." 
   3.From: Same Author above: 
     "There is a branch of Melancholia, called Hystermania. This is caused by strong black bile
     that accumulates in the digestive tract. From that part of the body in which this matter
     accumulates rise black vapors that envelop brain. Its symptoms are: belching out bitter fumes,
     finding food tasteless, taste of edibles reduced, worsening of digestion, belly inflation, stool
     liquefaction and rising of smoke-like fumes. " 
   4.From: 'Makhzan-e-Hikmat' Second Edition, Author Shamsul Atibba, Hakim Doctor Ghulam
     "Previous theory was that this disease manifested itself into disorders, arising from animal
     faculty or from those vital principles of amiability that originate from liver or digestive tract.
     But later researches indicate that this disease takes from nerves... in the men nervous internal
     system produces weaknesses of brain and is called Hyster-malaise. 
   5."Symptoms of this disease are: patient's letharginess and his anxiousness. He develops feelings
     of egotism, conceit and self-estimation. He is apt to exaggerate in his conversations, feels little
     appetite and suffers from Dyspepsia". 
   6.From: 'Ikseer-e-Azam,' Vol. 1, P. 189, Author Hakim Muhammad Azam Khan.
     "Symptoms of this disease are: digestive disorders, bitter vaporous belches, constant mouth
     watering, belly flatulence, bowels grumbling, stomach inflated and heated, false appetite
     vapors rising towards palate in fumes... Sometimes upper part of the body shivers and
     shakes, knock-down in severe attack, fainting and swooning..... sudden forgetfulness,
     drooping eye-lids, suffocation while swallowing, sudden lightning-like sparkle flashing in front
     of the eyes ....... 
   7.From: Same Author above:
     "Patient, if a religious scholar, lays claim to miracles, to prophet hood and to supernatural
     powers. He talks of Divinity and preaches to men." 

Comments: All the symptoms laid down by the experts of Medicine 
were present in Mirza to the utmost extent. Very true, he was a 
patient of Melancholic Hyster-malaise. 

There can be no better statement than the categorical pronouncement
of no less a person than the so-called 'Khalifat ul Masih Thani', 
Mian Mahmud Ahmad himself, in which he said that the disease of 
Hysteria was present in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad: "Men also have this 
disease and those who suffer from this are called Hyster-Maniacs."
(From Friday Sermon, by Mian Mahmud Ahmad, Khalifa Qadian, 
reproduced in Newspaper, 'Al-Fazl' Qadian Vol. 10, dated 
April 30, 1923). 

Mirza laid claims, very intensely, right from prophethood to 
Godhood. He called himself superior to all revered prophets and
claimed to have performed one million miracles. He also claimed
to be the King of the Aryans! He invited people to adopt his 
religion and those who rejected him he called them atheists, 
'Kafirs', and Hellish folks. He found faults with all the 
Prophets, (peace upon them all) called respectful Companions of
Our Prophet(SAW) (Allah be pleased with them all), as silly fools,
and abused the saints of the entire Ummat. He called Quranic 
commentators erring folks. He reproached narrators of the 
Traditions and categorized Ulemas of the Ummat with Jews. He
dubbed the whole Ummat as "gone astray from the path" and 
passed obscene remarks against learned men and pious persons. 

Can a godly person or a religious revivalist stoop so low? 

Certainly, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a maniac of Melancholic-

                   A Heart-felt Submission to Qadianis 

With utmost sincerity of heart, I make this submission to you. 

   1.It is possible that contents of this article have displeased you at places but my part is actually
     this much that I have quoted from Mirza's own writings. Making those a basis, I have
     evaluated facts. If you don't agree with my evaluation, then I leave it to you to judge for
     yourselves his truth or falsehood on the touchstone of his writings. 
   2.I tell you that all our revered prophets were most dignified souls. What to speak of them, even
     respectable saints and pious elders of our Ummat never tied challenges of truth/untruth. Their
     call to righteousness was direct. Here we find Mirza stipulating horrible bids for his veracity
     again and again. No sooner did he lose the wager, he tied another. Can such a gamble ever
     be a modus-operandi of chosen souls of Allah's faithful creatures? This point alone should
     suffice to guide anyone to truth provided Allah has bestowed him with judgment and insight. 
   3.Have you noticed that whereas Mirza risked his entire career over these gambles, Allah the
     Exalted, on the other hand, if I may say so, vowed to let Mirza never succeed in saying a
     thing, conditional on his truth. Anything Mirza would say, Allah would bring it to naught.

     For example, Mirza swore: 

     1. 'Sultan Muhammad will die';
     2. 'Abdulla Atham will die';
     3. 'Sanaullah will die';
     4. 'Abdul Haq Ghaznavi will die';

     and so on and so forth, "else call me a liar." Against this was the fated ordainment that the
     more he would resort to swearing the more impossible they would become.

     Indeed, it was a limit on the part of Mirza that when predicting about the death of an unholy
     Christian, he acknowledged himself to be 'the greatest accursed man on the earth' if that did
     not happen. And true enough, it did not happen. Allah, the Exalted, refused Mirza's plea
     against a defiled 'Worshipper of Cross.' (Mirza's words) Is 'here any instance to compare
     with it?'  For Allah's sake. Wonder over it. 
   4.If on the Day of Judgment, Allah the Exalted, puts this Question to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad why
     did you mislead people by claiming to be a prophet after Hazrat 'Khatam-Un-Nabieen'(SAW)?

     And in reply, if Mirza submits: "Ya Allah! I was a patient of
     Melancholic-Hyster-malaise. I told my people that I was a 'Miraqi' and even
     wrote it so in my books. Doctors said I was a maniac of Hysteria. Pray ask
     these 'sages' (the Qadianis) why did they follow nonsensical eruptions of a
     diseased 'Miraqi' maniac and accepted me as their Prophet and Masih". 

Then, my Brethren-in-humanity, what will you say in reply to Allah? 

eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/qadianism