Read the Original for Some of Our References
(Scanned Pages from the Qadiani Own Books)

Since the original writings of Mirza Ghulam and his associates are mostly in Urdu and not readily available, most Qadianis (Ahmadis) have only been exposed to the glorified propaganda of the leadership of the Qadiani movement. In various articles contained on this site, we provided authentic translation of Qadiani writings and, for some of the quotes, we provided links to scanned copy of the original pages. We felt this was necessary, since the Qadiani leadership often resorts to labeling our translations as inaccurate without providing one themselves!

We have decided to present this page of links to all relevant translations and source documents so that any interested party can independently verify the authenticity of our quotes.

Urdu

• Although in their official propaganda, Qadianis (Ahmadis) refer to their founder, Mirza Ghulam, as Mahdi or Messiah, the truth is that they view him as the most perfect prophet of God. Mirza Ghulam Qadiani himself claimed to be the perfected form of hazrat Muhammad^(SAW) (God forbid) and stated that anyone who joins him becomes a Sahaba (companion) of the Holy prophet^(SAW)! When a knowledgeable Qadiani praises “Muhammad”, he is really praising Mirza Ghulam! Mirza Ghulam wrote:

  “And Allah sent down upon me the bounty of the Holy Prophet and made it perfect; and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of the merciful Prophet, so that I became one with him. Thus, he who joins my group, joins the group of the companions (Sahaba) of my Leader, the best of messengers. It is not hidden from those who have the ability to think that this is what the words “Akhareen Menhom” (others of them) mean. The person who makes a difference between me and the Mustafa has neither seen me nor recognized me.”
  Read the original here: Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 258 – 259
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Regardless of the offical statement by Qadiani leadership, Mirza Ghulam did view himself superior to Muhammad^(SAW).  He Wrote:

  “One who denies that the mission of the Prophet^(SAW) is related to the 6th thousand (13th century) as it was related to 5th thousand (6th century), denies the truth and the text of the Quran and is among the zalemeen (gone astray). The truth is that the spiritual power of the Holy Prophet^(SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is much stronger, more complete and stronger than in those early years. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon).”
  Read the original here: Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 271 – 272
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Mirza Ghulam viewed his own statements as authentic as Torah, Bible, and Quran.  He reinterpreted Quran in a way which contradicts the rule of Arabic language, the teachings of the Holy Prophet^(SAW), his companions, and all Muslims for the last 1400 years.  He also rejected authentic Hadith only because they clearly refuted his teachings. He wrote:

  “The basis for our claims is not Hadith but Quran and that Wahi (revelation) which comes to me. Yes, in support we also present those Hadith which are according to Quran and do not contradict my Wahi. Rest of the Hadith, I throw them away like a waste paper.”
  Read the original here: Nuzool-e-Maseeh, Roohany Khazaen, Vol.19, P.140
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Qadiani propaganda material claims that Mirza Ghulam was subserviant to hazrat Muhammad^(SAW) and followed the Sharia of Islam!  Mirza Ghulam wrote the truth:

  “On top of it you must realize what Shariat (religious law) really is.  Simply it orders proper conduct and forbids indecency.  One who lays down certain commands and prohibitions (i.e. Amr bil Maroof and Nahi an-ilMunkar) is an ordinate of Shariat and I am the ordinate of Shariat, because my revelations contain both commandments (awamir) and prohibitions (Nawahi).  It is wrong that Shariat should decree totally new orders as there is much teaching in the Quran which is also found in the Torah.  That explains why, in the Quran, there is much reference to it in the following verse: ‘This has been revealed in the former books – those of Moses and Ibrahim.’”
  Read the original here: Arbain, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 17, P. 435–436
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

  “My teachings contain orders as well as prohibitions and renovations of important injunctions of the Shariah. For this reason, God has named my teachings and the revelations (Wahi) that comes to me as “Falak” (Boat)…. Thus see, God has declared my revelations, my teachings and my allegiance to be Noah’s Ark and as the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let him who has eyes see and him who has ears hear.”
  Read the original here: Arbain, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 17, P. 435
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Qadiani propaganda claims that their Kalima is the same as Muslim Kalima.  The truth is that when they say “Muhammad Rasurrollah”, they are referring to Mirza Ghulam.  The relationship of Qadianism to Islam is the same as that of Bahais to Islam.  Both view the prophethood of hazrat Muhammad^(SAW) to have been superceeded by that of their own prophet.  Here is official Qadiani Writing:

  “As the result of the advent of the Promised Messiah (Mirza Ghulam Qadiani), a difference has cropped up (in the meaning of Kalima). Before the appearance of the mission of the Promised Messiah, the words “Muhammad Rasurrollah” (Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah) included in their meaning only such messengers as had preceded him. But, after the mission of the Promised Messiah, one more messenger has entered into the meaning of “Muhammad Rasurrollah” (Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah).
  Therefore, on account of the incarnation of the Promised Messiah, the Kalima “La Ilaha Ellallah, Muhammad Rasurrollah” does not become abolished; it rather shines more brightly.  In short, the same Kalima is effective even now for embracing Islam, with the only difference that the incarnation of the Promised Messiah (Mirza Qadiani) has added one more Messenger to the meaning of “Muhammad Rasurrollah” (Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah)… Moreover, even if we accept by supposing the impossible that the sacred name of the merciful Prophet has been included in the Kalimah because he is the last of the prophets, even then no difficulty arises and we do not need a new Kalima because the Promised Messiah is not a separate entity from the Merciful Prophet as he (Mirza Ghulam) himself has said:  ‘My Entity has become his entity’ and ‘He who makes a distinction between me and Mustafa has not recognized me nor has seen me.’   And the reason for this is that Allah Almighty has promised that He would reincarnate the last of the Prophets (Khatam-un-Nabieen) to this world once more as it is evident from the verse “Akhareen Menhom” (… others of them). Thus, the Promised Messiah (Mirza Ghulam) is himself Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah, who had come to the world again to spread Islam. We do not, therefore, need any new Kalima. A new Kalima would have been necessary, if some other person had been reincarnated instead of Muhammad, the Prophet (Rasul) of Allah. So contemplate!”
  Read the original here: Kalimat-ul-Fasl, P. 158, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad Qadiani
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Qadiani propaganda claims that Ahmadis adhere to the principle of Finality of Prophethood.  The Truth is that, upon cliaming prophethood for himself, Mirza Ghulam rejected the concept of the Finality of Prophethood and called Islam of hazrat Muhammad^(SAW) dead and a satanic religion.  He held to this view until he dreamt of the scheme of calling himself “Muhammad” and the “Very Last of the Prophets”.  When Qadianis state that they believe in Finality of Prophethood, they mean they believe in Mirza Ghulam being the last of the Prophets (God forbid).  Mirza Ghulam said:

  “We believe that a religion in which the chain of prophethood stands severed (as in Islam of Muhammad) is dead. We call the religions of Jews, the Christians and the Hindus dead only because now there are no messengers in them. If this were the position in Islam, we would be no more than mere story-tellers. Why do we regard it superior to other religions? It must have some distinctive features.”
  Read the original here: Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol. 10, P. 127; Rabwa
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

  “That religion is no religion and that Prophet is no prophet by following whom a man does not come so close to God as to be honored with divine conversation (prophethood). That religion is cursed and contemptible which teaches that human progress depends only on a few narrated anecdotes (Sharia of Islam and Sunnah) and that divine revelations (Wahi) have lagged behind instead of going ahead…. Such a religion deserves to be called Satanic rather than divine.”
  Read the original here: Barahen-e-Ahmadia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 21, P. 306
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

  “How absurd and false it is to believe that after the Holy Prophet^(SAW) the door to divine ‘Wahi’ has been closed for ever and there is no hope of it in the future till the day of Resurrection – Worship tales only.  Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion?  I say, by God, that in this age there is none more disgusted than myself with such a religion.  I name such a religion Satanic, instead of divine.”
  Read the original here: Barahen-e-Ahmadia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 21, P. 354
  From Our Page: Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Muhammad^(SAW)

• Qadiani propaganda often denies the fact that Qadianism views Islam dead and Muslims as Kafirs.  The truth is that, in their misguided opinion, anyone who does not become a followers of Mirza Ghulam – even if he never heard of Qadianism – is a Kafir.  Mirza Ghulam himself wrote:

  “This is strange that you consider the person who rejects me and the person who calls me Kafir as two different persons, whereas in the eyes of God he is the same type; because he who does not accept me is because he considers me a fabricator…”
  Read the original here: Haqiqat-ul-Wahi, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 22, P. 167
  From Our Page: What do Qadianis (Ahmadiyya) think of Muslims

• Mirza Ghulam even went as far as abuse the grave of the Holy Prophet(SAW):

  “And God chose such a despicable site to bury the Holy Prophet(pbuh) which is extremely stinking and dark and cramped and was the site of the excreta of insects�”
  Read the original here: Tohfa-Golravia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol.17, P. 205
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam Qadianis and The Holy Shrines of Islam

• Mirza Ghulam abused Jesus^(pbuh) and his family to much verbal abuse.  This is a sampling of what he wrote about his competition to Messiahship:

  “What was the character of Messiah, according to you?  An alcoholic and gluttonous person, neither abstinent nor a pious worshipper, nor an adorer of truth.  He was a non-believer and an arrogant and self-conceited claimant of divinity.”
  Read the original here: Noor-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 387
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

  “Jesus’s three paternal and maternal grandmothers were fornicators and prostitutes, from whose blood Jesus came into existence.”

  “Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands, and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery, and rub his feet with her hair.  Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess.”
  Read the original here: Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

  “A beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to him, almost embracing him.  Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, at other times she lays her beautiful on his feet and plays in his lap.  In that condition, Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstasy.  If someone rises to object, he is scolded.  In addition to his youth, dependency on alcoholic beverages, and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body against his.  Is this the behavior of a virtuous person?  And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually provoked by the prostitute? …  The sexual excitement and arousal had done its work to the fullest.  This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say ‘Oh adulteress! Keep away from me’.”
  Read the original here: Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 449
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

  “A most shameful thing is that the sermon on the mount, which is the essence of the Bible, Jesus plagiarized from Talmud and pretended it to be his own preaching.  Since this fraud has been exposed, Christians are very embarrassed.   Jesus did this to perhaps gain influence by presenting some good teachings…  The unfortunate thing is that these teachings are an afford to the rules of Wisdom and upright conscience.”

  “The Christians have written about many miracles of Jesus, but the fact is that he performed no miracles.”
  Read the original here: Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 290
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

  “Very likely he (Jesus, The Messiah) may have healed some blind person or cured some other ailment by ordinary means.  Due to luck, there was a pond which was the source of great miracles, during his time.  It can be assumed that he also used the clay of the same (magic) pond.  The complete reality of his miracles is unfolded by this pond.  A categorical inference drawn from the presence of this pond is that, if he performed any miracles at all, they were not his miracles, rather those attributable to this pond.  He (Jesus) had nothing to his credit except cunning and deceit.”
  Read the original here: Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

  “It is unjustly said about the person (Jesus) who is buried in the locality of Khanyar, Sirinagar, Kashmir, that he is sitting in the Heavens.  How great an injustice is this!  God, in keeping to his promise has power over everything.  But, he can never send a person to this world the second time, whose first coming caused so much harm.”
  Read the original here: Dafi’-ul-Bala, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 18, P. 235
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

• Mirza claimed to be Messiah of the Prophecies.  To explain how he could be Jesus^(pbuh) reincarnated (instead of descending from heavens), he came up with this explanation:

  “God named me Mary in the third volume of Baraheen-e-Ahmadia (the book of ‘revelations’ written by Mirza).  I was nurtured for two years as Mary and was raised in a womanly seclusion.  Then, the spirit of Jesus was breath into me just as was done with Mary.  Hence, I was considered to be pregnant in a metaphorical manner.  After a period of several months, not exceeding ten, I was made Jesus out of Mary by the revelation embodied in the last part of the fourth volume of Baraheen-e-Ahmadia; and thus, I became Jesus, son of Mary.  But, God did not inform me of this secret at that time.”
  Read the original here: Kashti-i-Nuh, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 19, P. 50
  From Our Page:  Mirza Ghulam’s Tirade against Jesus^(pbuh)

• Qadianis are ashamed to admit that Mirza Ghulam considered himself to be an obedient and loyal servant of the British Imperialism in India, whose mission was to convince Muslims to become subservient to the rule of the British and to ensure they would not raise against the British rule.  Mirza’s own writings point this out clearly:

  “The benevolent Government is aware of the fact that we are from among their servants, their sympathizers and well wishers. We have come to their aid with a firm mind in every hour of need. My father was held in close and high esteem by the Government; and our services to this Government held clear distinction. I do not think that the Government has forgotten these services of ours. My father, Mirza Ghulam Murtada, son of Mirza Ata Muhammad Al-Qadian, was a great well wisher and friend of this government and enjoyed great respect from among them. Our loyalty has been proven beyond doubt. Rather our fidelity was proven among the people and became clear to the government officials. The Government may confirm this from the officers who came to this side and lived among us; so that they may tell what sort of life we lived, and how faithful we have been in serving their Government.”
  Read the original he